This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSBAR

4 ptsExemplaryLearner identified key client background information in SBAR format addressing the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation. This information gives a brief, yet comprehensive, overview of the client presentation.2 ptsDevelopingLearner identified key client background information in SBAR format, but one or more of the sections is missing key information: situation, background, assessment, and recommendation.

0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsLearner did not complete the SBAR section.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMap concept

4 ptsExemplaryThe learner correctly chose the concept of the map which is identified from Concepts for Nursing Practice eBook.2 ptsDevelopingA concept was identified, but the selected concept is not appropriate or applicable to the client’s condition. This may also be selected if the concept chosen does not fit the information filled out in the map.

0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsThe learner did not identify a concept for the map.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognize cues

4 ptsExemplaryBased on available client data, the learner identified 4 relevant or important cues or information associated with the concept. Specific client values were included when appropriate (ie. heart rate, oxygen saturation, etc). Subjective and objective data could be considered.2 ptsDevelopingBased on available client data, the learner identified 3 relevant or important cues or information associated with the concept. Specific client values were included when appropriate (ie. heart rate, oxygen saturation, etc). Subjective and objective data could be considered.

0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsBased on available client data, the learner identified zero to 2 relevant or important cues or information associated with the concept. Specific client values were not included when appropriate (ie. heart rate, oxygen saturation, etc).

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze cues

4 ptsExemplaryBased on the cues identified, learner determined at least 3 conditions that might be present and are consistent with those cues.2 ptsDevelopingBased on the cues identified, learner determined 2 conditions that might be present and are consistent with those cues.

0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsBased on the cues identified, learner determined at zero to 1 condition(s) that might be present and are consistent with those cues.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrioritize hypotheses

4 ptsExemplaryLearner used this strategy for this section: Where do I start? Based on the analysis of the client’s condition, the learner determined which explanations are most likely. They listed and ranked at least 3 hypotheses according to most urgent problems and priority order.2 ptsDevelopingLearner used this strategy for this section: Where do I start? Based on the analysis of the client’s condition, the learner determined which explanations are most likely. They listed and ranked 2 hypotheses according to most urgent problems and priority order.

0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsLearner used this strategy for this section: Where do I start? Based on the analysis of the client’s condition, the learner determined which explanations are most likely. They listed and ranked zero to 1 hypotheses according to most urgent problems and priority order.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGenerate solutions: SMART goals

4 ptsExemplaryUsing the hypotheses, the learner identified at least 4 desirable outcomes for the client. Goals were listed in SMART format (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound).2 ptsDevelopingUsing the hypotheses, the learner identified at least 3 desirable outcomes for the client. Goals were listed in SMART format (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound).

0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsUsing the hypotheses, the learner identified zero to 2 desirable outcomes for the client. Also use this criterion if goals were not listed in SMART format.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTake action

4 ptsExemplaryUsing the identified SMART goals, learner identified and described how at least 4 nursing interventions will be performed, administered, communicated, or taught. These interventions will address the priority concern and achieve the desired outcomes. Interventions are designed to help meet the clients goals. Intervention #1 should be crafted to help meet SMART goal #1.2 ptsDevelopingUsing the identified SMART goals, learner identified and described how 3 nursing interventions will be performed, administered, communicated, or taught. These interventions will address the priority concern and achieve the desired outcomes. Interventions are designed to help meet the clients goals. Intervention #1 should be crafted to help meet SMART goal #1.

0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsUsing the identified SMART goals, learner identified and described how zero to 2 nursing intervention(s) will be performed, administered, communicated, or taught. Also use this criterion if the intervention(s) is/are not crafted to help meet the corresponding client goals.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate outcomes

4 ptsExemplaryLearner compared observed outcomes against expected outcomes. For each of the 4 listed interventions, the learner was able to discuss how to determine if the identified interventions were effective. This section requires 4 evaluation criteria. The evaluation should contain subjective/objective data to support the evaluation. Learner was able to correctly evaluate if Goal #1 was accomplished by Intervention #1 by the time frame specified; this was repeated for goals and their associated interventions.2 ptsDevelopingLearner compared observed outcomes against expected outcomes. For each of the 3 listed interventions, the learner was able to discuss how to determine if the identified interventions were effective. This section requires 3 evaluation criteria. The evaluation should contain subjective/objective data to support the evaluation. Learner was able to correctly evaluate if Goal #1 was accomplished by Intervention #1 by the time frame specified; this was repeated for goals and their associated interventions.

0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsLearner compared observed outcomes against expected outcomes. For each of listed interventions, the learner was able to discuss how to determine if the identified interventions were effective. This section contained zero to two evaluation criteria. The evaluation is missing subjective/objective data to support the evaluation.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference(s)

3 ptsExemplaryLearner correctly completed a Reference page and included in-text citations giving credit to their source(s) using APA 7th edition format. Listed in the reference are the author, the publication year, and the source.1.5 ptsDevelopingLearner incorrectly applied APA 7th edition format to references and/or in-text citations.

0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsThe learner did not complete a Reference page or utilize in-text citations.

3 pts