This assignment is already done but it need some changes to it based off the instructor notes
THIS IS THE ASSIGNMENT
When writing your assessment, be sure to:
- Use the to guide the formatting and organization of your writing.
- Cite any references to sources in a References page.
- Include the for Assessments 2 and 3 as an appendix, after the References section.
Organization
Organize your reflection with the following sections:
Title Page
- Include a title page with the following title: Critical Reflection and Writing Process Evaluation.
Introduction
- Your introduction needs to identify the focus of your reflection for readers; it should be no longer than one-half page.
Writing Process Evaluation
- Evaluate your personal writing process in this course.
- Be sure to include evidence by specifying important revision choices you applied in response to feedback from your instructor or your own rethinking of Assessments 2 and 3.
- Explain how you might apply lessons learned or strategies used during the writing of the assessments in this course to future writing tasks related to your program and your chosen profession.
- Be sure to explain how specific writing resources can be helpful.
Systems Thinking
- Explain how systems thinking can provide a framework for exploring the professional issue or problem that you focused on in Assessments 2 and 3.
Professional Growth
- Evaluate the impact of the course on your understanding of professional goals, future courses, and strategies for program success.
- Articulate your professional strengths and opportunities for growth.
- Identify organizations, and other resources, services, and activities that could be used for professional development to strengthen your skills.
Conclusion
- Your conclusion should emphasize the main themes in your paper and include the impact of this course on your understanding of your professional goals, your thoughts about future doctoral coursework, and your strategies for success in your EdD program.
References
- Cite any references to sources on a References page.
Appendix
- Include the Writing Revision Matrix documents for Assessments 2 and 3.
THE ASSIGNMENT IS ASSESSEMENT4 BUT I AM ATTACHING ASSSESSMENT 2 AND 3 IN CASE YOU NEED TO USE THEM
INSTRUCTOR NOTES FROM ASSESSMENT 3
Competency 2
Apply information literacy skills to locate and critically evaluate scholarly data, theories, and research.
Criterion
Support arguments with reference to scholarly literature.
Your Result:PROFICIENT
Supports arguments with reference to scholarly literature.
Faculty Comments:You have used five references from the literature to support your arguments.
Competency 4
Analyze the characteristics of ethical behavior and respect for diversity and civil discourse.
Criterion
Describe connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization, including examples.
Your Result:PROFICIENT
Describes connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization, including examples.
Faculty Comments:You have tried to explained the connections among these issues and the specialization of educational leadership. Your content, however, is not well organized so even though there is a connection to educational leadership, it is not clear as the connection from one issue to another. You need to reorganize and use connection phrase, word, and sentences.
Criterion
Analyze scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization.
Your Result:PROFICIENT
Analyzes scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization.
Faculty Comments:I can see that you tried to synthesize the information but rather than show similarities among the findings in the literature, you demonstrated the differences.
Criterion
Evaluate challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in a professional educational setting.
Your Result:PROFICIENT
Evaluates challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in a professional educational setting.
Faculty Comments:Be more specific on the challenges posed by these issues and provide examples to illustrate your discussions.
Competency 5
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and appropriate to purpose.
Criterion
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
Your Result:BASIC
Organizes content with some logical flow, but some transitions are missing or unclear.
Faculty Comments:You need to add transitional sentences so that the content flows more smoothly and your ideas are linked together.
INSTRUCTOR NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT 2
Because this was your final submission for this assessment (you submitted the wrong paper the first time), I was a little lenient on the APA formatting. There were errors that you will want to make sure you do not make on the next assessment. Also, the Pangram report indicated that the percentage of AI generated content was still at 49%. On your next assessment it needs to be 100% human written. I am not sure how you are using AI but you need to trust your own skills and not use AI except to correct your grammar, for example. Do not let any AI program change your sentence structure or content.
E. Waller
Scoring Guide
Competency 1
Determine how action research and systems thinking apply to professional problems, challenges, or issues in education.
Criterion
Provide a detailed description and examples illustrating how a chosen topic relates specifically to one’s specialization.
Your Result:DISTINGUISHED
Provides a detailed description, examples illustrating how a chosen topic relates specifically to one’s specialization, and rationale for the chosen examples.
Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – You have described how this topic relates to the specialization of educational leadership.
Criterion
Analyze information gathered in a literature review.
Your Result:PROFICIENT
Analyzes information gathered in a literature review.
Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – What questions were not answered in your search of the literature. Is more research needed on this topic?
Competency 2
Apply information literacy skills to locate and critically evaluate scholarly data, theories, and research.
Criterion
Evaluate scholarly articles using principles of critical thinking.
Your Result:PROFICIENT
Evaluates scholarly articles using principles of critical thinking.
Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – Synthesize the findings by discussing how scholars or researchers shared similar ideas.
Criterion
Incorporate scholarly journal articles relevant to one’s study.
Your Result:DISTINGUISHED
Incorporates more than five scholarly journal articles relevant to one’s study and provides rationale for the chosen articles.
Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – You have incorporated five articles in support of your arguments.
Competency 5
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and appropriate to purpose.
Criterion
Integrate appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and APA citation style.
Your Result:PROFICIENT
Integrates appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and APA citation style.
Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – There are errors in your APA formatting that need to be corrected.
THE MATRIX DOCUMENT HAS TO BE COMPLETE BASED OFF THE NOTES FROM THE INSTRUCTOR LISTED FOR ASSESSMENT 2 AND 3
Requirements: READ CAREFULLY
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.