Here is my work requirement with rubric just need to finish all please no AI at all after accepting i will send my work individually, also please use the same tone dont use big words
Task: By now you have done extensive research on your topic, using primary scientific articles from the last 5 years to show data answering your central thesis question in biology. You must have a clearly defined central thesis, and not be missing any key background information or data in the chosen field. There is no minimum number of references, but in my experience, a reasonable number of references is 12-15 total, with 4-6 of those being primary articles. You can use older papers for some background, but the bulk of the data needs to be new
The paper is expected to be between 4000-5000 words (approximately 20 pages long in 12-point font, double spaced, 1 margin). Title, references and other supporting materials will not be counted for the word count. The word count needs to be on the paper itself. Papers are due in electronic format Wed, 4/9 by midnight (electronically). Please upload in Word format only!!! I am unable to add comments to pdfs or open .heic files.
All pertinent text must be cited appropriately and a reference list must be attached as the last pages of the paper. It is expected that proper formatting, grammar and sentence structure be used and that ALL errors are corrected.
It is expected that your introduction and general background is around 500-750 words long, after which, you must start presenting real data. This class is structured in a way that will keep you on track for writing. Because of this, you will not be allowed to hand in your final paper without first submitting the rough draft.
This is a free plagiarism checker.
We are aiming for less than 10% identity and no long sentences that are exact match
These are my references and some background on them.
(This is the professor feedback on my rough draft)
It looks like youre off to a good start! I know this is a work in progress, so forgive me if I point out things youre still working on in my comments.
In general, it looks like you have a really solid foundation, and youve done a great job pulling out the meaning behind a lot of the aspects of methods and results! Some general comments:
- Dont forget citations!
- You want to include a ton of the details for the methods and results of each paper. For methods that includes things like sample size, how they chose participants, details on methodology, etc (generally you had a lot of this just missing a few things here or there).
- For results, that includes things like the data values, statistical results (p values and stats) and in some cases you may want to pull a graph in. You did a good job of reporting the take home message, youre just missing the details.
- Some sections arent written in complete sentences. This is usually something I fix during edits towards the end (not a big deal right now).

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.