Important Writing Requirements
- Language: English
- Academic Level: Undergraduate (USF IDS 2378)
- Length: 34 pages, double-spaced
- Font: Times New Roman, 12-point
- Format: Word or PDF
- Citation Style: APA (light use is fine)
- Tone:
- Human-written
- Reflective and analytical
- Natural academic voice (not robotic, not AI-sounding)
- Sentence Style:
- Mix of short and medium-length sentences
- Avoid repetitive structures
- Smooth transitions between paragraphs
Core Belief to Write About
Belief: Critical thinking is more important than memorization in learning and professional growth.
(This belief has already been used in previous mini-write assignments.)
REQUIRED STRUCTURE & CONTENT
SECTION 1 Personal Belief & Ethos ( 1 page)
The writer should:
- Clearly state the belief
- Explain why this belief is personally significant
- Describe how it developed over time
- Connect it to personal, academic, or professional experiences
- Articulate a personal ethos (values that guide actions and decisions)
- Acknowledge any initial assumptions or biases
SECTION 2 Disciplinary Perspectives ( 1.5 pages total)
Each subsection should be about page.
A. STEM Perspective
- How STEM fields view critical thinking vs. memorization
- Role of data, problem-solving, experimentation, and analysis
- Strengths and limitations of this belief from a STEM lens
B. Social Sciences Perspective
- Psychological or sociological views on learning and cognition
- How culture, behavior, and human development relate to the belief
- Any challenges or support this discipline provides
C. Business & Communication Perspective
- How business and management value critical thinking
- Decision-making, leadership, adaptability, and communication
- Potential assumptions or biases (efficiency, productivity, profit focus)
Each discipline should:
- Identify key variables/concepts
- Explain how the discipline interprets the belief
- Go beyond description and include analysis
SECTION 3 Synthesis & Evaluation ( 1 page)
The writer should:
- Compare and synthesize the three disciplinary perspectives
- Identify strengths and weaknesses of the belief
- Discuss assumptions, biases, and alternative viewpoints
- Reflect on how disciplinary lenses reshaped or deepened understanding
- Conclude with a thoughtful, logical evaluation of the belief
WHAT THE PAPER MUST DEMONSTRATE
- Strong critical and analytical thinking
- Clear interdisciplinary synthesis
- Logical organization and smooth transitions
- Original reflection (not generic or surface-level)
- Clear effort to meet Exceeds Expectations rubric criteria
WHAT TO AVOID
- AI-sounding or overly polished language
- Listing disciplines without analysis
- Oversimplified or obvious conclusions
- Repetitive sentence patterns
FINAL GOAL
A human-written, well-structured 34 page draft that fully meets IDS 2378 requirements and is ready for instructor feedback before the final paper.
Requirements: 3-4 page

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.