write two responses to a peers discussion post

  1. Construct a post in which you:
    • Confirm that the selected article is primary research. If you agree, state that. If you disagree, explain your thoughts and provide evidence.
    • State whether you agree with the study design reported by your peer. If you do not agree, propose a study design and provide a brief rationale supported by evidence.
    • State whether you agree with the level of evidence reported by your peer. If not, describe how you would rate it.
    • Describe areas of disagreement (only) on matrix elements; itemize them as needed. If you agree with your peers abstraction of all matrix elements, state that.
    • Search for a high-quality review article relevant to your peers PICOT question.
    • Share the APA reference with hyperlink and abstract.

First post link to study:

McManus, B. M., Richardson, Z., Schenkman, M., Murphy, N., & Morrato, E. H. (2019). Timing and intensity of early intervention service use and outcomes among a safety-net population of children. JAMA Network Open, 2(1), e187529.

second post link to study:

Pawik, ., Pawik, M., Karwacka, M., Wysoczaska, E., Schabowska, A., Kuciel, N., Biernat, K., Dbiec-Bk, A., Lewandowska, J., & Fink-Lwow, F. (2021). Body balance after fascial therapy in athletes with soft lower limb muscle injuries. Symmetry, 13(9), 1586.

There should be a total of two responses (1 to for each post)

Requirements: a few paragraphs

WRITE MY PAPER


Comments

Leave a Reply