WK3Assgn_Ingram_A

To prepare: Identify the demographics of your local or nearby prison (e.g., racial, gender, etc.). and of your state in general. Consider how the local prison population and your state general population differ culturally (e.g., race, gender, socioeconomic, underserved, etc.). Based on what disparity you identify between the prison and general populations, select one cultural population (e.g., racial, gender, underserved, etc.) and conduct an academic literature search in the Walden Library that discusses the unique characteristics, considerations, and/or challenges related to working with that population and the role of culture addressed in the treatment of the specific forensic population you selected. For your Assignment, use the Masters and Doctoral Sources APA Course Paper Template (APA 7) accessed from the Writing Templates web resource in the Learning Resources. Address the following: Cite the research article and state the specific diversity population that you researched. Identify the demographics of your local or nearby prison (e.g., racial, gender, etc.). Identify the demographics of your state in general. Evaluate how the local prison population and your local general population differ in cultural breakdown (e.g., race, gender, socioeconomic, underserved, etc.). Choose a cultural disparity between these populations. (e.g., disparity in racial makeup of the general population versus the prison population in your region or state; or disparity in the gender makeup of the prison population versus the general population, etc.). Based on what disparity you identify above, select one cultural population (e.g., racial, gender, underserved, etc.) and conduct an academic literature search in the Walden Library and select at least one scholarly article from a peer-reviewed journal that discusses the unique characteristics, considerations, and/or challenges related to working with that population. Briefly summarize the research article and explain how the role of culture is addressed in the treatment of the specific forensic population you selected. Analyze the role of culture in the treatment of forensic populations, in general. Support your analysis with your selected article and additional scholarly literature. PSY_6511_Week3_Assignment_Rubric FPSY_6511_Week3_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponsiveness to Paper Assignment 10 to >8.95 pts EXCELLENT Paper Assignment is responsive to and excels at addressing requirements given in the instructions. It: Responds to the assigned or selected topic; and Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated); and Is substantive and evidence based; and Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course, and that the papers topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and Is submitted by the due date. 8.95 to >7.95 pts GOOD Paper Assignment is responsive to and meets the requirements given in the instructions. It: Responds to the assigned or selected topic; and Is substantive and evidence based; and Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course, and that the papers topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and Is submitted by the due date. 7.95 to >6.94 pts FAIR Paper Assignment is somewhat responsive to the requirements given in the instructions. It: Somewhat misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or Lacks in substance, relying more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence; and/or Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the papers topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and Is submitted by the due date. 6.94 to >0 pts POOR Paper Assignment is unresponsive to the requirements given in the instructions. It: Misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or Relies primarily on anecdotal evidence; and/or Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the papers topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and/or Is submitted past the late deadline. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Knowledge 20 to >17.9 pts EXCELLENT Paper Assignment demonstrates/provides: In-depth synthesis of the literature related to the topic of study; a clear and accurate interpretation or analysis is provided illustrating that the student has absorbed key ideas; makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects them to other ideas; and In-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the readings (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions), showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects them to other ideas; and Rich and relevant examples; and Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, and new perspectives; and Original and critical thinking; and Mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the readings. 17.9 to >15.9 pts GOOD Paper Assignment demonstrates/provides: Synthesis of the literature related to the topic of study, an accurate interpretation or analysis is provided illustrating that the student has absorbed key ideas; makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects them to other ideas; and Understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the readings, showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented; and Relevant examples and Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, some original thinking, and critical thinking; and Mastery and application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the readings. 15.9 to >13.8 pts FAIR Paper Assignment demonstrates/provides: Minimal synthesis of the literature related to the topic of study, a somewhat accurate interpretation or analysis is provided illustrating that the student has absorbed key ideas and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects them to other ideas; and Minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the readings, and, while it is generally accurate, displays some omissions and/or errors; and/or Few and/or irrelevant examples; and/or Few if any thought-provoking ideas, little original thinking; and/or Regurgitated knowledge rather than critical thinking; and/or Little mastery of skills and/or numerous errors in the application of knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the readings. 13.8 to >0 pts POOR Paper Assignment demonstrates/provides: A lack of synthesis of the literature related to the topic of study, a lack of accurate interpretation or analysis is provided illustrating that the student has absorbed key ideas and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects them to other ideas; and A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the readings, and/or application containing many omissions and/or errors; and/or No examples or irrelevant examples; and/or No thought-provoking ideas or original thinking; and/or No critical thinking; and/or Many critical errors in the application of knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the readings. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing 10 to >8.95 pts EXCELLENT Paper Assignment is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate, and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment. 8.95 to >7.95 pts GOOD Paper Assignment is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources. 7.95 to >6.94 pts FAIR Paper Assignment is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality). 6.94 to >0 pts POOR Paper Assignment is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources. 10 pts Total Points: 40