Week 8 Assignment: 8-to-10-minute narrated presentation vi…

You will create an 8-to-10-Minute Narrated Video made using Panopto or any other video tool. Videos must include you presenting slides with content regarding your paper.

Using or any other software tool, create a recorded presentation that promotes your EBP paper from Week 7. You may use PowerPoint or any other media to develop up to 10 slides to be used in the video presentation.

The presentation should

• Explain models clarity and conciseness.
• Discuss models diagrammatic representation.
• Discuss model’s comprehensiveness.
• Discuss model’s easiness, discuss model’s flexibility.
• Explain the models use and popularity.
• Describe the resources needed to implement the model.

Include a table that summarizes your evidence in the presentation. Conclude with a summarization of the key points and major lessons you learned from this project.

Presentation Guidelines

Below is a list of the video presentation guidelines:

1. Review the rubric. It will ensure all the required components are present in order for you to obtain the most credit for your efforts.
2. Include visual aids. Reinforce your presentation with graphs, pictures, or charts to keep the presentation interesting and to support your findings.
3. Organize your work. Plan your presentation and structure it in a clear and logical manner. Use professional language and support your content with current literature.
4. Duration of the video is limited to no more than 8-10 minutes You must personally narrate the presentation starting with “This is [your name]” Narration must be audible and clear.
5. Presentation should be made from no more than 10 slides (not including the title page and references) and must have a professional appearance.
6. The first slide contains the title and your name. Content slides must contain both text and images with appropriate captioning to ensure clarity.
7. The final version must be a narrated video recorded using Panopto or any software or tool. The videos will be uploaded to the assignment using My Panopto Videos. See instructions for

EBP Project Presentation Rubric

EBP Project Presentation Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Introduction

5 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Clearly identifies the EBP common model selected.

2.5 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Selected uncommon model or does not discuss any model.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Explains models clarity and conciseness

15 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Clearly explains the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and addresses in details how they can support answering their PICOT question.

13.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Describes the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and addresses with some details how they can support answering their PICOT question.

12 pts

Approaches Expectations

Explains the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and partially addresses how it relates to their PICOT question.

9 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Inadequately explains the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization or does not relate them to their PICOT question.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Discussion of models diagrammatic representation

15 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Thoroughly explains the model’s diagram, addressing how it enhances understanding and applies to the PICOT question, while discussing its clarity, comprehensiveness, and relevance for clinical practice or evidence-based implementation.

13.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Discusses the diagram, pointing out its basic features and its connection to the PICOT question, though lacking deep analysis of how the diagram enhances understanding.

12 pts

Approaches Expectations

The diagram is mentioned, but the description is vague or lacks connection to the PICOT question.

9 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to provide a meaningful evaluation of the diagram or its relevance to the PICOT question.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Discussion of models comprehensiveness

15 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Explains how well the model addresses all aspects of the PICOT question (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, time) and explains its broad, holistic approach to solving the clinical problem.

12.99 pts

Meets Expectations

Discusses how well the model addresses most aspects of the PICOT question, though some elements may not be fully covered.

9.99 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides limited explanation of how the model covers the PICOT question, with a focus on only a few elements.

8.01 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not adequately explain how the model applies to or addresses the PICOT question.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Discussion of model’s easiness

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Thoroughly explains the ease of understanding and applying the model in clinical practice. Considers factors such as simplicity, user-friendliness, and accessibility for healthcare professionals.

8.66 pts

Meets Expectations

Discusses how easy or difficult the model is to understand and implement but lacks sufficient details regarding its ease of use in clinical settings.

6.66 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides minimal or unclear evaluation regarding the ease of applying the model.

5.34 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not address the ease of understanding or applying the model.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Discussion of model’s flexibility

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Explains the models adaptability across various clinical settings or populations. Describes how the model can be modified or applied to different situations and still maintain its effectiveness.

8.66 pts

Meets Expectations

Notes that the model may be flexible but does not discuss in detail how it can be applied in diverse settings or populations.

6.66 pts

Approaches Expectations

Describes limited flexibility or applies it only to a specific scenario without considering broader applications.

5.34 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not discuss the flexibility of the model.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Explanation of models use and popularity

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provides a detailed explanation of the models current use in practice and its popularity among healthcare professionals. Points out evidence of its widespread adoption or endorsement in research or clinical settings.

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Mentions the models use in practice but lacks substantial evidence or discussion of its popularity or widespread use.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Briefly addresses the use of the model but lacks depth in discussing its popularity or application in practice.

6 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to provide any meaningful discussion on the models use or popularity.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Resources Needed

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Fully describes the various resources needed to implement the model. Critically examines internal and external resources, as well as any supplies that will be needed. Explains human resources needed.

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Describes the feasibility of the model; describes some potential barriers and includes some strategies to overcome them.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

States a few resources needed to implement model. Identifies internal and external resources that will be needed, but does not fully elaborate.

6 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to explain the various resources needed to implement the model. Does not address the internal or external resources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization of Presentation

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Slides are visually well designed, aesthetically pleasing with appropriate use of white space, visuals, and minimal text, on each slide; color and animations are used judiciously; theme is evident throughout to produce a highly cohesive presentation; free from errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Slides are effectively designed with visual appeal including white space, visuals, and minimal text for the most part; color and animations are used appropriately; theme is evident in the presentation for the most part to produce a cohesive presentation and/or minor errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Slides generally include a mix of white space, visuals, and/or text but not consistently and/or some overuse or inappropriate use of color or animations; theme is not consistently evident throughout the presentation and/or some errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.

6 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Slides generally lack visual appeal and are text-heavy with little or no visuals and/or exhibit an overuse of color or animations; no theme is evident and the presentation appears disjointed rather than unified and/or frequent errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Quality of Argument in Presentation

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Shows a deep/robust understanding of the model and how it fits the PICOT question. Clearly articulates a position or argument in EBP importance and implementation.

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Shows a limited understanding of the model and how it fits the PICOT question; articulates a position or argument that is incomplete or limited in EBP importance and implementation

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Shows a superficial understanding of the model and how it fits the PICOT question. Articulates a position or argument that is unfocused or ambiguous in EBP importance and implementation

6 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Shows no understanding of the model and how it fits the PICOT question. Does not articulate a position or argument in EBP importance and implementation

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Presentation Delivery

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Delivers with a good volume and energy, proper pace and diction; uses complete and grammatically correct sentences

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Delivers with a good volume and energy, generally proper pace and diction; uses almost complete and grammatically correct sentences

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Delivers with a low volume and energy in most of the presentation, generally proper pace and diction; some sentences were incomplete or included some errors.

6 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Delivers with a low volume or energy; pace too slow or fast; some sentences were incomplete or included many errors.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Conclusion

5 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Concisely summarizes key points and major lessons learned from the project.

4.33 pts

Meets Expectations

Summarizes some of the key points and lessons learned from the project.

3.33 pts

Approaches Expectations

Summarizes a few points and lesson learned from the project.

2.67 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to summarize the key points and lesson learned from the project

5 pts

please do powerpoint, with narration notes or presentation notes. I will do narration.