Week 7: Course Project Final Paper

• Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 175 Submitting a file upload Available after Feb 14 at 11:59pm

Instructions

The Course Project Final Paper is due this week.

Review the in the Introduction & Resources Module for details about this project (paper).

Action

Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

Once you have uploaded your file, select Submit Assignment.

Rubric

HRM330 Week 7 Course Project Rubric

HRM330 Week 7 Course Project Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Documentation and Formatting

The paper should follow instructions as outlined under the guidelines. Include a title and reference page. At least three scholarly resources with in-text citations in the paper.

20 to >15.0 pts

Excellent

The paper completely follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are included. At least three scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.

15 to >10.0 pts

Competent

The paper competently follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are included. At least two scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

The paper somewhat follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are included. At least one scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.

5 to >1.0 pts

Poor

The paper poorly follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are not both included. At least one scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization and Cohesiveness

The paper should have topical flow with like subjects in each paragraph. Paragraphs should flow and link from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session should be integrated. Paragraph transitions should be present and logical. Page count should follow guidelines.

20 to >15.0 pts

Excellent

The paper clearly had topical flow with like subjects in each paragraph. Paragraphs flowed and linked from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was integrated. Paragraph transitions were present and logical. Page count followed the guidelines.

15 to >10.0 pts

Competent

The paper competently had topical flow with like subjects in most paragraphs. Paragraphs flowed and linked from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was integrated. Paragraph transitions were present and logical. Page count mostly followed the guidelines.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

The paper somewhat had topical flow with like subjects in a few paragraphs. Paragraphs somewhat flowed and linked from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was somewhat integrated. Paragraph transitions mostly present and logical. Page count somewhat followed the guidelines.

5 to >1.0 pts

Poor

The paper had poor topical flow with few subjects in some paragraphs. Paragraphs did not flow and link from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was not completely integrated. Paragraph transitions were not clearly present and logical. Page count did not follow the guidelines.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Introduction

The introduction provided sufficient background on the topic and previews the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.

25 to >20.0 pts

Excellent

The introduction clearly provided sufficient background on the topic and previews the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.

20 to >10.0 pts

Competent

The introduction competently provided background on the topic and previews most of the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

The introduction somewhat provided background on the topic and previews some of the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.

5 to >1.0 pts

Poor

The introduction did not provide sufficient background on the topic and previews very few points to be defined in the body of the paper.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Content

The paper content should be thorough, yet concise. Information included should be relevant to the topic and provide depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. All key elements of the assignment should be covered in a substantive way. Concepts should be reviewed clearly, supported by specific details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper should link theory to relevant examples of current concepts and industry practice. There should be correct use of vocabulary and theory.

65 to >45.0 pts

Excellent

The paper content was very thorough and concise. Information included was relevant to the topic and provided depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. All key elements of the assignment were covered in a substantive way. Concepts were reviewed clearly, supported by specific details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper linked theory to relevant examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper had the correct use of vocabulary and theory.

45 to >25.0 pts

Competent

The paper content was thorough and concise. Information included was relevant to the topic and provided depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. Most key elements of the assignment were covered in a competent way. Concepts were reviewed, supported by adequate details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper linked theory to some examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper had the correct use of vocabulary and theory.

25 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The paper content was somewhat thorough and concise. Information included was somewhat relevant to the topic and mostly provided depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. Some key elements of the assignment were covered in an adequate way. Concepts were somewhat reviewed, supported by some details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper somewhat linked theory to a few examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper mostly had the correct use of vocabulary and theory.

10 to >1.0 pts

Poor

The paper content was not thorough and concise. Information included was not completely relevant to the topic and did not provide depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. Few key elements of the assignment were covered. Concepts were not clearly reviewed, supported by details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper did not clearly link theory to examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper did not have the correct use of vocabulary and theory.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

65 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Conclusion

The conclusion is restating the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points, include final thoughts of what is next, and state the significance of any findings. Conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper.

25 to >20.0 pts

Excellent

The conclusion thoroughly restated the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points and included clear final thoughts of what was next, and stated the significance of any findings. Conclusion was very logical, flowed from the body of the paper.

20 to >10.0 pts

Competent

The conclusion competently restated the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points and included final thoughts of what was next, and stated the significance of any findings. Conclusion was mostly logical, flowed from the body of the paper.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

The conclusion somewhat restated the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points, included a few thoughts of what was next, and stated the significance of any findings. Conclusion was somewhat logical, flowed from the body of the paper.

5 to >1.0 pts

Poor

The conclusion did not completely restate the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points, include final thoughts of what was next, and state the significance of any findings. Conclusion was not logical, flowed from the body of the paper.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Editing

Sentences should be complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions should be present and maintain the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation should be followed. Spelling should be correct. Sentence structure to be clean and clear. The writing style should follow appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.

20 to >15.0 pts

Excellent

Sentences were complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were be present and maintained the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were followed. Spelling was correct. Sentence structure was clean and clear. The writing style completely followed appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.

15 to >10.0 pts

Competent

Sentences were competently complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were be present and competently maintained the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were followed. Minimal spelling errors were present. Sentence structure was clean and clear. The writing style followed appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

Sentences were somewhat complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were be present and somewhat maintained the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were followed. Several spelling errors were present. Sentence structure was somewhat clean and clear. The writing style somewhat followed appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.

5 to >1.0 pts

Poor

Sentences were not complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were not clearly present to maintain the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were not completely followed. Spelling errors were present. Sentence structure was not clean and clear. The writing style did not follow the appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

20 pts

Total Points: 175

My Topic is The Future Viability of the United Auto Workers (UAW) with some information coming from the 2024 strike.