Week 7 Case Study

Assignment Details

Submission Type: An 8- to 10-minute video presentation

You will prepare a clinical case for audio/video presentation. The patient’s case should be based on the students recent clinical experience, and the patient’s diagnosis should be pertinent to the current semester. Cases must be presented using an audio/video recording platform compatible with submission to Canvas. In addition, a written transcript of the case presentation must be submitted with the presentation and have less than 20% match on Turnitin/AI detection software.

The recording of the clinical case presentation should be a maximum of 8 minutes. When presenting, students should not read directly from a document. The case presentation should be organized into a concise summary. The student should include how course objectives were met by completing this assignment in both the audio/visual and written presentation.

Note

Expect feedback from your assigned faculty in relation to any comments, questions, encouragement, and suggestions you might have presented as part of your ongoing professional development. This assignment is vital for faculty to assess your progress, provide guidance, and support your growth as a competent and compassionate nurse practitioner.

Final Reminders

Videos can be recorded using any software or tool, but all videos are required to be uploaded to My Panopto Videos for assignment submission.

You can also use the Panopto Desktop Recording tool to create your video.

Detailed Panopto instructions are located .

See the rubric for specific grading criteria.

Rubric

Week 7 Signature Assignment: Audio-Visual Diagnostic Case Study with Video Presentation- Video

Week 7 Signature Assignment: Audio-Visual Diagnostic Case Study with Video Presentation- Video

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Subjective

SOAP Note (Written Portion)

10.2 pts

Exemplary

Thorough, well-organized, and relevant information. Includes C/C, OLDCART, and pertinent positives/negatives. No extraneous data.

6.87 pts

Proficient

Well-organized with C/C, OLDCART, and pertinent findings. May contain minor extraneous data or lack one minor detail.

3.55 pts

Developing

Lacks clear organization or key OLDCART components. Contains extraneous data and/or is missing multiple minor details.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Disorganized, inadequate information, or mixes subjective and objective data. Missing crucial information.

10.2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Objective

SOAP Note (Written Portion)

10.2 pts

Exemplary

Accurate diagnosis with ICD code, well-supported by S/O data. Includes appropriate differential diagnoses.

6.87 pts

Proficient

All relevant exams performed but may include some extraneous ones. Mostly organized by body system.

3.55 pts

Developing

Omits important exams or lacks consistent organization by body system.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Omits crucial exams, mixes subjective data, or lacks any organization.

10.2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Assessment

Accurate diagnosis with ICD code, well-supported by S/O data. Includes appropriate differential diagnoses.

10.2 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Accurate diagnosis with ICD code, well-supported by S/O data. Includes appropriate differential diagnoses.

6.87 pts

Proficient

Accurate diagnosis with ICD code, supported by S/O data. May lack some differential diagnoses or have less clear support.

3.55 pts

Developing

Diagnosis may be accurate but lacks ICD code, or has significant omissions in differential diagnoses.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Inaccurate diagnosis, unsupported by data, or lacks differential diagnoses.

10.2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Plan

SOAP Note (Written Portion)

10.2 pts

Exemplary

Comprehensive, evidence-based plan addressing each diagnosis. Individualized to the patient. Includes all 5 components: Dx plan, Tx plan, patient education, referral/follow-up, and health maintenance.

6.87 pts

Proficient

Well-organized, evidence-based plan addressing most diagnoses. Includes medication teaching and most of the 5 components. May lack minor details or individualization.

3.55 pts

Developing

Plan lacks organization or evidence-base. May not address all diagnoses or include all 5 components. Lacks medication teaching or individualization.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No plan, disorganized plan, or plan not based on evidence. Fails to address diagnoses or include key components.

10.2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Course Objectives

SOAP Note (Written Portion)

10.2 pts

Exemplary

Student thoroughly describes how course objectives were met by completing this assignment.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Student does not provide an in-depth discussion of how course objectives were met by completing this assignment.

10.2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Clinical Presentation

(Video Case Presentation)

14.75 pts

Exemplary

Presents subjective and objective data in an organized and professional way. Presents all important data (subjective or objective), including all pertinent histories.

9.82 pts

Proficient

Presents subjective and objective data in a mostly organized and professional way. Most supporting data is pertinent and detailed. Includes some extraneous data. Presents all/most important data (subjective or objective), including histories.

4.88 pts

Developing

Presents subjective and objective data in a somewhat organized and professional way. Some supporting data is pertinent and detailed. Includes much extraneous data. Misses one or two pieces of important data (subjective or objective). Does not report pertinent historical data.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presents subjective and objective data in an unfocused, disorganized, and/or unprofessional way. Supporting data is impertinent and irrelevant. Misses significant amounts of important data (subjective or objective).

14.75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Clinical Reasoning, Problem-Solving, and Management

(Video Case Presentation)

14.75 pts

Exemplary

All subjective and objective information is thoroughly synthesized and organized to formulate the correct diagnosis. Plan incorporates current standards of care that address presenting symptoms, appropriate diagnostic tests, treatments, patient education, and referrals. Includes and refers to all resources (e.g., preceptor, guidelines) consulted for this case.

9.82 pts

Proficient

Most subjective and objective information is synthesized and organized to formulate the correct diagnosis. Plan incorporates most current standards of care but is missing one or two minor components that address presenting symptoms, appropriate diagnostic tests, treatments, patient education, and referrals. Includes and refers to many resources (e.g., preceptor, guidelines) consulted for this case.

4.88 pts

Developing

Some subjective and objective information is organized and may or may not formulate a correct diagnosis. Plan incorporates some current standards of care but is missing many components that address presenting symptoms, appropriate diagnostic tests, treatments, patient education, and referrals. Includes and refers to a few resources (e.g., preceptor, guidelines) consulted for this case.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Subjective and objective information is disorganized and formulates an incorrect diagnosis. Plan does not incorporate current standards of care and is missing components that address presenting symptoms, appropriate diagnostic tests, treatments, patient education, and referrals. Does not include or refer to any resources (e.g., preceptor, guidelines) consulted for this case.

14.75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Time Management and Video Delivery

(Video Case Presentation)

14.75 pts

Exemplary

Case is well-organized and delivered within 8 minutes. Presentation flow demonstrates careful and complete planning, preparation, and practiced execution. Speaker maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around). Speaker does not rely on notes nor slides and presents with a professional tone and academic language.

9.82 pts

Proficient

Case is mostly organized and delivered within 10 minutes. Presentation flow demonstrates some planning, preparation, and practiced execution. Speaker generally maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around) with only a few lapses. Speaker sometimes relies on reading notes and/or slides and presents with a mostly professional tone and academic language.

4.88 pts

Developing

Case is somewhat organized and/or delivered within 12 minutes. Presentation flow shows little planning, preparation, and practiced execution. Speaker indicates little preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. Speaker often relies on reading notes and/or slides and presents with a somewhat professional tone and academic language.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Case is poorly organized, incomplete and/or the delivery exceeds 15 minutes. Presentation flow demonstrates little or no planning, preparation, or practiced execution. Speaker lacks eye contact and has unprofessional body language. Speaker reads from notes and/or slides and presents with an unprofessional tone and informal language.

14.75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Course Objectives

(Video Case Presentation)

14.75 pts

Exemplary

Student provides a discussion of how course objectives were met by completing this assignment.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Student does not include discussion of how course objectives were met by completing this assignment.