Week 6 MGT350

For this assignment, which supports the final in module 8, provide a profile of the target company you are using throughout this course. Articulate at least three long-term company goals. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the companys strategies and policies. Are the companys strategies and policies ethical, and sustainable, and do they demonstrate good corporate social responsibility given the companys long-term goals? Why or why not?

Your paper should be 5-6 pages in length and align with APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (link available in the left-hand navigation panel). Include at least 2 credible references including the course textbook. The CSU Global Library is a good place to find these references (link available in the left-hand navigation panel).

Rubric

MGT350_M06_PM

MGT350_M06_PM

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Requirements

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all the required components as specified in the assignment.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Content

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of a company’s long-term strategy for growth; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Critical Analysis

20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

CLO5: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of an organizations policies and strategies.

16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Sources / Examples

5 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least three credible sources as specified in description. Sources meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates two credible sources as specified in description. Sources meet required criteria but are lessthan adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

3 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates one credible source as specified in description. Source is poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

2 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources. Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style || Demonstrates proper use of APA style

5 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar, spelling and APA formatting.

4 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar, spelling and APA formatting.

3 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar, spelling and APA formatting.

2 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling and APA formatting.

5 pts