week 6

Final Exam Pt 1Analysis

Final Exam Pt 1Analysis

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

1. Description & Theory

30 pts

Complete

Description and analysis of the conflict accurately apply theories of I-It relationships and collusion.

24 pts

Developing

Description and analysis of the conflict accurately apply EITHER the theory of I-It relationships OR the theory of collusion, but not both.

18 pts

Incomplete

Description and analysis of the conflict inaccurately apply theories of I-It relationships and collusion.

0 pts

Absent

Analysis is missing OR is not original work.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

2. Challenges & Opportunities

40 pts

Complete

Analysis of the conflict accurately identifies three challenges and three opportunities for transforming the conflict, AND gives detailed explanations of each.

32 pts

Developing

Analysis of the conflict accurately identifies three challenges and three opportunities for transforming the conflict, BUT explanations are only general.

24 pts

Incomplete

Analysis of the conflict accurately identifies fewer than three challenges and three opportunities for transforming the conflict, OR inaccurately identifies challenges and opportunities, OR explanations are nonexistent.

0 pts

Absent

Analysis of the conflict’s challenges and opportunities is minimal OR is missing OR is not original work.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

3. Connections

30 pts

Complete

The relationship between the analysis and the proposed peacebuilding roleprovider, teacher, bridge-builder, equalizer, healer, or witnessis accurate AND explained in detail. NOTE: The roles of arbiter, mediator, referee, and peacekeeper are not options for this project

24 pts

Developing

The relationship between the analysis and the proposed peacebuilding roleprovider, teacher, bridge-builder, equalizer, healer, or witnessis accurate BUT not explained.

18 pts

Incomplete

The relationship between the analysis and the proposed peacebuildingprovider, teacher, bridge-builder, equalizer, healer, or witnessrole is inaccurate OR unclear.

0 pts

Absent

The relationship between the analysis and the proposed peacebuilding role is incomplete OR is missing OR is not original work.