Using systems archetypes to help you understand the problems…

In this task, you will choose one case study from the attached Case Studies document. You will analyze the case study using the tool from Section 2 (systems archetypes tool) to draw conclusions about a system’s relationships, connections, properties, and subsystems. Choose one of the systems archetypes to help you understand the problems in the case study. You will submit a completed systems archetypes tool and a completed analysis that includes the problems in the case as understood through relationships, connections, properties, and subsystems. It will be important to address any changes that occur throughout the case, as shown by the selection of a particular systems archetype.

Note: You must use a systems archetypes tool.

Requirements

Your submission must represent your original work and understanding of the course material. Most performance assessment submissions are automatically scanned through the WGU similarity checker. Students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity report to generate after uploading their work and then review it to ensure Academic Authenticity guidelines are met before submitting the file for evaluation. See for more information.

Grammarly Note:
Professional Communication will be automatically assessed through Grammarly for Education in most performance assessments before a student submits work for evaluation. Students are strongly encouraged to review the Grammarly for Education feedback prior to submitting work for evaluation, as the overall submission will not pass without this aspect passing. See for more information.

Microsoft Files Note:
Write your paper in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) unless another Microsoft product, or pdf, is specified in the task directions.Tasks maynotbe submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc. All supporting documentation, such as screenshots and proof of experience, should be collected in a pdf file and submitted separately from the main file.For more information, please see

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

A. Chooseoneof the case studiesfrom the Case Studies file in the Supporting Documents for Task 2 at the bottom of this page, and then analyze your chosen case studyby doing the following:

1. Analyze your chosen case study usingoneof the eight systems archetypes this course covers in Section 2, Lesson 2.

2. Submit an accurately completed systems archetype diagram (sometimes referred to as a causal loop diagram) that matches the details of your chosen archetype and chosen case study.

Note: You can create your diagram using one of the templates from the Task 2 Diagram Templates file in the Supporting Documents below.

3. Summarizethe problem(s) in your chosen casestudyby explaining how the parts of your case study relate to one another through your chosen archetype and the changes that occur within the overall system.

B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

Note: Sources are NOT required for this task, but if sources are used, they must be acknowledged and cited appropriately. Fake, non-existent, or AI-generated sources are not acceptable.

C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions

File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

Rubric

Not Evident

This submission includes pervasive errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation, negatively impacting the professional quality and clarity of the writing. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category.

Approaching Competence

This submission includes substantial errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category.

Competent

This submission includes satisfactory use of grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and punctuation, which promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

Requirements: in-depth/ total completion

WRITE MY PAPER

Using systems archetypes to help you understand the problems…

Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply