To what extent do you agree that doubt is central to the pur…

SO this is an TOK essay and you should have an intro and then one AOK that is Natural sciences, where as your claim you shold have MMR denialism and for the counter claim AIDS denialism, and for the other AOK, you should do Human Sciences and come up with your own claim and counter claim.

Notes from teacher:

TOK essay outline

Essential here is to be focused on the question and be as clear as possible.

To do this you need to make claims and counterclaims and explain them.

The structure to help you out is:

Paste your chosen TOK essay prompt and remember the AOK you are discussing.

AOK 1

Claim + explanation

Counterclaim + explanation

If you put them this way, you will be sure that claims and counterclaims are connected with the prompt.

Remember that claims and counterclaim have to come out of your chosen prompt, and their explanations should reflect your idea how to deal with the prompt. Try to use one of the 12 key concepts in your claims and c-claims.

After you make your claim and c-claim, find appropriate real-life examples to support your claims and counterclaims (describe them by stating who, when, where BUT CONNECT THEM WITH YOUR CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS).

Finally, the third part is evaluation, where you tell us how do your claim and counterclaim contribute to understanding the question.

• In conclusion, answer the main prompt, give reasons for it, validate your thesis. If you didn’t have a thesis in the intro, discuss the implications of your conclusion. Aim for 160-200 words.
• Technical stuff: Times New Roman, 12 pts, double space, justify the text, page numbers. References can be links pasted in footnotes. A bibliography page is mandatory, any referencing style ( APA) No names, no cover page, only the full essay title at the top of the first page. Max 1600 words, without the title and references.
• Connect claims/counterclaims and their explanations to flow naturally.
• Explain chosen examples to reflect your claims/counterclaims.
• Think of implications as answers to your claim/counterclaim in the context of the prompt.