* answer this discussion for two students like the examples.
Ethical Relativism
This week we are discussing ethical relativism. What are the pros and cons of the belief that ethics ought to be relative, i.e. normative ethical/cultural relativism? In other words, it might be obvious that certain cultures do indeed have different ethical beliefs, but what do we make of the claim that this should/ought to be the case?
example 1
Ethical relativism has many pros and, to some extent, cons. Ethical relativism allows everyone to have their own moral values that make sense to them and their culture. I do believe that every person is entitled to their own moral values. I don’t mind what others’ views are because none of them affect me. It is easy to accept so many people when you realize their choices have no impact on your personal life. Your views are the only thing that can cause impact on you and your life. The faster you accept others, the more peace will be drawn into your life. The cons are that for some, their views are willing to take lives. I still personally believe that every scenario has its exceptions, despite an unfortunate outcome.
Example 2
As with most aspects of human life on Earth, there are pros and cons to cultural relativism. It is important to be able to have a variety of norms and ways of life in the many different cultures around the world. Even more essential is that we respect those differences, possibly even learn from one another. The pros of having these contrasts is that we can grow and develop as we better understand and admire why they have chosen these practices to be representative as part of their society. On the other hand, if it is something that we may feel is wrong, or not showing humanity, we can try and convince them to perhaps see things differently. This can be the fine line where the cons begin, since suggesting a change can cause conflict and wars. We should not confuse an attempt to help another society improve for its people, with simply just disagreeing with their way of life, just because we do not agree does not mean that we should interfere or be so bold as to want them to change. We should all be able to mesh and blend our lives on this planet.
Example 3
Ethical relativism is the idea that morality is relative to a culture’s norms, and what is right or wrong depends on different societies. The pros to ethical relativism are that the environment a person is in determines what is typical, ethical relativism promotes tolerance, as there is no way to control other cultures’ ideas of ethics, and it also forces us to open our minds and question what is truly right and wrong in our own personal beliefs. Some cons of the acceptance of ethical relativism are that practices that are obviously (to some) wrong have no choice but to be overlooked. It can stop ethical ideas from being shared, which could prevent societies from progressing. I personally do believe in ethical relativism. Depending on the culture and enviroment you are born and raised in, it is normal to have different beliefs, so this should apply to ethics as well. Although many of us could say something like murder is wrong, there are always going to be situations where it is not, such as self-defense, escaping from a captor, and sometimes even revenge can seem justified. Every entity and culture is entitled to its own ethical beliefs, and I don’t think anyone has the right to question that.
Example 4
Ethical relativism is the belief that moral values and ethical rules are not universal but instead depend on culture or society. A benefit of this perspective is that it encourages empathy and reduces ethnocentrism, as it allows people to see that ethical beliefs make sense in their cultural context. For example, customs around punishment, gender roles, or social duties differ around the world, and ethical relativism reminds us that no single set of rules applies everywhere. However, a drawback is that it can prevent us from condemning clearly harmful actions, like human rights abuses, simply because they are socially accepted in a given culture. It can also make it difficult to argue for global ethical standards or moral improvement, since rightness is always relative. In short, ethical relativism helps us appreciate cultural diversity in ethics, but it may also limit our ability to address wrongdoing or set universal moral guidelines.
Example 5
The notion that what is “right” or “wrong” is determined by society standards and cultural values is known as ethical relativism. One benefit is that it encourages tolerance and facilitates understanding of diverse viewpoints. It clarifies why moral convictions differ throughout history and throughout communities without categorically declaring them to be incorrect.
Its ability to excuse hazardous behaviors just because a culture tolerates them is a drawback, though. It might also make it challenging to challenge our own moral convictions or to advance universal human rights.
To sum up, ethical relativism is useful for understanding and appreciating different cultures, but we also need to balance it with universal values to keep people safe.
Example 6
Ethical Relativism, being the idea that cultural norms and societies affect what we think of as “right” or “wrong” or “ethical” and “unethical”, has good aspects to it as well as bad aspects depending on the scenario or actions taken into account. I believe some of the advantages and benefits that our cultural norms has on our ethics is the way you grow up and the people who are around you as you are growing up could have a profound effect on who you end up being, what you think is right, and what isn’t. Our cultural norms constantly revolve around us while we are growing up and learning, making us and teaching us to understand different perspectives, practice different cultures, and have distinct moral beliefs. I think this is extremely important to establish a standard of morality and ethics across the board, regardless of language, cultural, or ethical distinctions. On the other hand, I think some of the drawbacks or disadvantages of this relation could be that people also need to think for their own and base their own morality and ethics on their choices and perspectives. We could see when cultural differences deeply entangle and cross the boundary of what would seem “unethical” in some cultures, but is perceived as perfectly “ethical” in theirs.
Requirements: follow
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.