To demonstrate critical thinking in the integration of social work knowledge, values, and skills, and to prepare for the Mid-Term and Final Evaluations, students must submit a 4-7 page reflection on practice at their agency. This paper should be uploaded into the mid-term evaluation in Sonia.
All assigned papers or essays must be typed or word-processed. All papers must conform to APA (7th ed.) format. If references are used, the references must also come from government or agency reports, books, or academic journals. Sources such as Wikipedia are not acceptable sources for references. Students may find them useful for general information and also citations, which can be explored for acceptable resources.
Here are the directions for the paper:
|
|
Reflect on how this might be different from last semester. |
Once the reflection is written there are several steps that MUST be completed for this assignment to be completed. The reflection needs to be loaded into the midterm form in Sonia. Additionally the student needs to mark the status of the CDP learning activities in the midterm column in the CDP and also score oneself on the midterm form.
|
Grading Rubric for the Reflection on Practice and CDP Learning Activities Status Completion(Total Points Possible:15) |
|
|
Integration of Knowledge, Skills, and Values |
|
|
0 points |
Reflection fails to demonstrate critical thinking in integration of knowledge, skills, and values in practice |
|
1-2 points |
Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in integrating knowledge, skills, and values in practice |
|
3-4 points |
Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in integrating knowledge, skills, and values in practice |
|
5 points |
Reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in integrating knowledge, skills, and values in practice |
|
Personal Growth |
|
|
0 points |
Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate a neutral experience with negligible personal impact. Lacks enough inferences, examples, personal insights and challenges |
|
1-2 points |
Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. |
|
3-4 points |
Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges |
|
5 points |
Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made examples, well developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges |
|
Professional Presentation |
|
|
0 points |
Excessive spelling, grammatical errors and unprofessional terminology are present.CDP learning activities status is not completed. |
|
1 point |
Numerous spelling, grammatical, errors and unprofessional terminology are present.CDP learning activities status is not completed |
|
2 points |
Numerous spelling, grammatical, errors and unprofessional terminology are present. CDP learning activities status is completed |
|
3 points |
Less spelling, grammatical errors and use of unprofessional terminology are present. CDP learning activity status is not completed OR the paper is free of errors, but the CDP status is not submitted. |
|
4 points |
Few spelling, grammatical errors and use of unprofessional terminology present CDP learning activities status is completed. |
|
5 points |
Free of spelling and grammatical errors. Professional terminology is present.CDP learning activities status is completed. |
If the student has not completed their part of this assignment by the deadline without prior permission from the Practicum Liaison, the Practicum Liaison can reduce the score accordingly.
The score based on the rubric and any deductions for lateness will be posted in Blackboard.
Requirements: 4-7 pages

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.