Review of Classic Sociology Work
Read a classic work of sociology or analysis of a classic sociologist (see below) and prepare a response according to the following rubric. chooce one work and use the guidelines given in rubric
- Turner, Stephen. Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Moralist. ( in Grambling Library)
- Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. ( in Grambling Library)
- Mills, C. Wright. The Sociological Imagination ( in Grambling Library)
- Elias, Norbert ( in Grambling Library)
- Foucault, Michel ( in Grambling Library)
- Mauss, Marcel ( in Grambling Library)
- Wallerstein, Immanuel. Modern World-System ( in Grambling Library)
- Kuhn, Thomas ( in Grambling Library)
- Bordieu, Pierre ( in Grambling Library)
- Habermas, Jurgen ( in Grambling Library)
|
Proficient (10 pts) |
|
|
Citation |
Provided complete and accurate citation at beginning of review |
|
Contextualization |
Describes accurately the time period and major events that are the subject of the book; the geographical and chronological scope; the major debates in which the work is participating |
|
Outline: structure |
Describes how the chapters are organized. Succinctly provides a vivid description of the content of the chapters. Describes how supporting material enhances from/ detracts from structure |
|
Outline: evidence |
Describes the evidence that the author used to make the argument. Discusses primary and secondary sources used. Provides relevant examples of evidence. Notes if book overly reliant on certain sources or excludes other types of sources. |
|
Analysis: Authors point of view |
Identifies the type of sociology the author is addressing If present, Identifies assumptions the author makes in terms of sociological biases or key terms that author employs that may demonstrate bias If present, describes how historical motivations affect the way in which the book is argued Describes the balance of book and ways the author may have exaggerated, distorted, or dismissed material. |
|
Analysis: usefulness |
Describes opinion of book; addresses for whom this book would be useful and why |
|
Mechanics |
Well-written, academic prose. Minimal spelling or grammar errors. |
|
Formatting |
Follows the structure of an academic book review. Falls within the word count of 900-1100 words. Essay submitted in times new roman, 12 pt font, 1 margins. Correctly submitted to Canvas in word document or pdf |
|
Proficient (20 pts) |
|
|
Analysis: argument |
Describes the essence of the main argument as well as any supporting arguments. Provides an evidence-based account of strengths and weaknesses of book Discerns effectiveness of argument as well as any points of breakdown; provides illustrative points of argumentation. Discusses how well evidence proves argument. Discusses role of book in larger sociological debate. |
Requirements: 1200

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.