(1,200 words minimum) Youll use Project 2 to identify a goal and develop a plan to execute this goal. Youll work through rhetorical composing steps. This project will be the basis for your third project in the course. Think about this project as imagining a possible future in your life. This could be academic, workplace, or community changes you would like to bring about, such as creating bike paths or promoting recycling or championing fair access to resources. You will choose your rhetorical goal (with help from your peers and instructor). As you work through how you will achieve this goal, youll think about six facets of the rhetorical approach: purpose, audience, context, strategies, medium, and arrangement. A Statement of Purpose and Design Plan: In the first half of this essay, you are to identify your purpose (or goal), your intended audience, and the context of your situation. You explain the exigence (problem) youre responding to, and you propose how your chosen audience can help solve this problem. You are to use the research you conducted in your research proposal to help elaborate your exigence, context, audience, and goal. In the Design Plan section of this essay, you are to elaborate on your rhetorical composing strategies (such as ethos, logos, pathos, cultural knowledge, bodily experience, and identification). You should discuss how you specifically plan to use those strategies to move your audience into action. You should also discuss how the website as a digital medium will help reach your audience. Finally, you should discuss the arrangement and design of your website. Explain how each section of your website achieves a certain goal in order to move your audience toward your intended action. You will use this Design Plan to connect how your strategies, medium, and arrangement will connect between your purpose, audience, and context. Statement of Purpose: What is your purpose or goal? What is it that you want your audience to do? It may be helpful to think about your local context and community. Who is your intended audience? Again, its easier if you think on a local level. Are you addressing voters in Leon County? FSU, FAMU, or TCC students? What is the group of people that will help you best achieve your goal? What is the context of the situation? What is the problem youre responding to? What has already been done or not done about it? Who would care about this problem? Why should people care about this problem? Design Plan: What strategies will you use to move your audience to action? How will the concepts of ethos, logos, and pathos help shape your text? What tone will you take? What type of images will you include? Videos? What kind of text will you write? How formal or informal should your language be? The medium of your text will be a webpage. How will a webpage best serve your purpose? How do you want your audience to use your webpage? How will you arrange your webpage? What will it look like? What tabs will you create? What headers, pictures, and information will you include? Tips to succeed: Choose a small-scale issue or goal. Youre not going to change the world in with one webpage. Think of something that may actually be implemented, such as getting people to recycle on campus or getting people to register to vote for the next election. Dont think about this purpose as totally changing someones mind. Thats not realistic. Think about creating something that will influence how someone thinks about something or encourages them to take a step towards something. The more manageable your goal is, the more productive youll be with this project. Be very specific when choosing your Its impossible to reach everyone. Its impossible to reach everyone in Tallahassee even. Narrow your intended audience down so you can compose content that is specific to their needs. Be willing to revise your idea as you go. Youll get input from you peers and instructor. Think about how purpose and audience work together and be willing to adapt as you go forward. Research Proposal Evaluation Rubric Grade Characteristics A The proposal identifies a manageable issue, the authors stance, and the intended purpose relative to a particular audience. The proposal presents a clear and coherent organizational structure. The proposal effectively summarizes, analyzes, and synthesizes sources in support of its explicit purpose. The proposal acknowledges how the authors stance was influenced by the source texts and forecasts how those sources can be used to influence an audience or make a claim. All sources are properly cited in the body of the proposal and on its Works Cited page. B The proposal somewhat effectively identifies a manageable issue, the authors stance, and the intended purpose relative to a particular audience. The proposals organizational structure is apparent but lack some coherence. The proposal adequately summarizes, analyzes, and synthesizes sources in support of its apparent purpose. The proposal somewhat acknowledges how the authors stance was influenced by the source texts and vaguely forecasts how those sources can be used to influence an audience or make a claim. Most sources are properly cited in the body of the proposal and on its Works Cited page. C The proposal generally identifies a manageable issue, the authors stance, and the intended purpose relative to a particular audience (at least one of these concerns is neglected). The proposals organizational structure lacks coherence. The proposal offers some summary, analysis, and/or synthesis of sources in support of its apparent purpose, but its treatment of the sources is superficial. The proposal neither acknowledges how the authors stance was influenced by the source texts and nor forecasts how those sources can be used to influence an audience or make a claim. Some sources are properly cited in the body of the proposal and on its Works Cited page. D/F The proposal does not identify a manageable issue, the authors stance, and/or the intended purpose relative to a particular audience (at least two of these concerns are neglected). The proposals organizational structure lacks coherence. The proposal does not summarize, analyze, and/or synthesize sources well (or the sources may not be relevant for the projects purpose). There is little or no indication of how the sources will be used to influence an audience or make a claim. Few or no sources are properly cited in text and in the Works Cited page. (Is Social Media Friend or Foe? Social Medias Effect on College Students Mental Health We live in a modern society in which we use phones, computers, laptops, etc., to communicate with each other. Social media has taken a hit in the lives of many and has become a top sensation, especially for high school and college students. They use them to do multiple things, including texting, calling, posting, and keeping our lives updated. We use it to highlight our most important moments, shed light on troubles that need to be spoken about, and inspire us to be better. It is our nature as humans to bond with others on social media, but one who sees too much on social media tends to overthink and compare themselves and their own lives. This is mostly seen in Gen Z, specifically those 18-29 years of age, as they are the era of technology and the peak of modernization. Most of this generation are off in college, studying for exams and difficult curriculums. This is already a stress factor on them, and adding on more to their own self-esteem is basically the cherry on top and an open gate for insecurities to rush in. We are open to these kinds of ideas that they should do the same thing as that person just so they can feel better about themselves. A lot of people talk about how this generation is heavily addicted to the internet, but do they understand why? It is time to let in more light on this topic, reduce the judgement, and increase the support for others who wish to be their best version of themselves. Comparison is one’s greatest nemesis in life, especially when you have limited resources. The psychological effects of comparison regarding the usage of social media have increased by a mile over the years, with 93% of them likely comparing themselves on social media platforms. Breaking down this percentage, 41% of them were likely comparing themselves on Instagram, 34% were likely comparing to others on Tiktok and the remainder of them were comparing on Youtube. With this information only being in the UK.)

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.