Rewrite Essay to pass AI checker

The core content goal is to conduct a performance analysis that either uses a humor theory as a “lens” to explain a specific routine or uses the performance to “test” and suggest a revision to the theory itself. The objective is to achieve depth over breadth by narrowing your focus to a specific motif, segment, or delivery element to build an original, evidence-based argument about how humor functions.

My current essay draft argues that Ithat Tig Notaros “Taylor Dayne” routine exposes a fundamental flaw in the incongruity-resolution model, which typically claims that laughter is a reward for resolving a cognitive puzzle. By analyzing Notaros use of robotic repetition and her mid-performance “blanking” on lines, I demonstrate that the audiences laughter actually intensifies even when there is no new information to resolve or when the narrative structure completely collapses. I propose a theoretical revision: that a “humor mindset”a playful frame established through tone and deliveryis the truly foundational requirement for mirth, making traditional resolution an optional rather than a necessary component of comedy.

Please enesure the content and arguments and language level and tone is maintained, but just rewrite it so that it doesnt get flagged for AI. BUT STILL LET IT FLOW AND MAKE SENSE AND NOT USE WEIRD, UNSUED LANGUAGE. I have included readings so that my quotes come from, and feel free to use othres ones too that MAKE SENSE AND ARE RELEVANT.