Research Literature Review

Overview Think about ideas and questions you have related to social work practice. Ideas might include topics that already have been researched, new ideas for practice, program effectiveness, or intervention effectiveness. This literature review is an opportunity for you to establish a theoretical framework for research. Within this review, you will also articulate how you have addressed ethical and socially just, anti-oppressive practice in research, as well as diversity considerations. It is important to review a broad base of scholarly literature to ensure that your problem statement is sound and that your approach addresses your problem and is supported by research. You may need to alter your methodology or approach following the literature review. Description As you know, your literature review creates a theoretical foundation for your research and guides the development of your research question. As you research, be sure to consider multiple perspectives and theories, rather than simply viewing your idea through one lens. This ensures that you find the most reliable and accurate methodologies and theories to support your research proposal. Prior to beginning your literature review assignment, you will conduct a review of scholarly and peer-reviewed research from a variety of sources. You may use the Capella library and government websites as locations to begin research for your literature review. Instructions Preparation Select a topic related to social work that you are interested in addressing. Utilize at least five peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last 5 years. These articles should be specifically related to the topic you have selected for your study. Organize the information in your literature review as follows. Introduction Prepare the reader for what to expect by briefly summarizing the key points from each of the sections that follow. Research Question Identify your research questions and whether they are qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Sample qualitative research question: How can social service organizations promote self-care for their employees? Sample quantitative research question: How does salary level relate to productivity measures for clinical social workers? Sample mixed-method research question: How does teacher job satisfaction relate to student performance outcomes? Research Question: Socially Just and Diversity Considerations Respond to the following questions: How does your research question include considerations for diversity? (Bent-Goodley) How does your research question reflect the concerns of diverse populations? (Bent-Goodley) Who might be excluded and/or may not benefit from the research questions? (Paquin et al.) Nature of the Problem: Ethical, Socially Just, and Anti-Oppressive Considerations Describe the background of the topic you have identified. Be sure to cite your literature and address the following: Examine possible causes of the problem. Describe systemic factors that may contribute to the identified problem. (Danso) Identify at least three specific stakeholders you would want to include to further identify common needs and issues of the community. (Danso) Target Population and Intersectionality Describe the target population for your study. Then address the following: Describe how the literature you have selected is reflective of the population you plan to include in your study. (Bent-Goodley) Discuss how you might use an intersectionality framework in your research, clearly identifying at least one additional intersection of experience within the target population that should be considered. (Tajima) Positionality Create your positionality statement, being sure to include the following: Your “societal ascribed identities.” Personal life experiences, motivations, and connections. Any “insider-outsider” considerations. (Tajima) Summary Provide a brief review of each of the sections and point out the major areas of knowledge that have yet to be developed regarding your topic. Identify the unique contributions your study will make and point out the importance of learning the new information your study will offer. Additional Requirements Your assignment should also meet the following requirements: Written communication: Written communication is free from errors that detract from the overall message. References: In addition to articles in the courseroom and other sources, you must cite at least five peer-reviewed journal articles with most published within the last 5 years. These articles should be specifically related to the topic you have selected for your study. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to the current APA style and formatting standards. The Evidence and APA Links to an external site. section of the Writing Center can help with that. Length of paper: 47 double-spaced pages, not including cover page and references page. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. Due date: Submit your assignment no later than 11:59 p.m. CST Sunday of this week. By successfully completing this assignment, you demonstrate your proficiency in the following competency and generalist practices: CSWE EPAS Competency 1: Demonstrate ethical and professional behavior. C1.GP.C: Demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior, appearance, and oral, written, and electronic communication. Related assignment criteria: 6: Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. CSWE EPAS Competency 4: Engage in practice-informed research and research-informed practice. C4.GP.A: Use practice experience and theory to inform scientific inquiry and research. Related assignment criteria: 1: Develop a relevant research question and identify the type of research. 4: Describe the target population for the study, including diversity and intersectionality considerations. 5: Create a researcher positionality statement. C4.GP.B: Apply critical thinking to engage in the analysis of quantitative and qualitative research methods and research findings. Related assignment criteria: 2: Describe how a research question reflects social justice and diversity considerations. 3: Describe the background and possible causes of a problem, including systemic factors and stakeholders. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Use practice experience and theory to inform scientific inquiry and research. (C4.GP.A) Develop a relevant research question and identify the type of research. (C4.GP.A) Describe the target population for the study, including diversity and intersectionality considerations. (C4.GP.A) Create a researcher positionality statement. (C4.GP.A) Competency 2: Apply critical thinking to engage in the analysis of quantitative and qualitative research methods and research findings. (C4.GP.B) Describe how a research question reflects social justice and diversity considerations. (C4.GP.B) Describe the background and possible causes of a problem, including systemic factors and stakeholders. (C4.GP.B) Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession. (C1.GP.C) Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards (C1.GP.C) Week 4 Assignment: Research Literature Review Week 4 Assignment: Research Literature Review Criteria Ratings Pts Develop a relevant research question and identify the type of research. (C4.GP.A) 32 to >27.2 pts DISTINGUISHED Develops a relevant research question and identifies the type of research and the research question aligns closely with the identified problem. 27.2 to >22.4 pts PROFICIENT Develops a relevant research question and identifies the type of research. 22.4 to >0 pts BASIC Develops a relevant research question or identifies the type of research, but not both OR the research question does not align with identified problem. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not develop a relevant research question and identify the type of research. / 32 pts Describe how a research question reflects social justice and diversity considerations. (C4.GP.B) 32 to >27.2 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes how a research question reflects social justice and diversity considerations and cites relevant peer-reviewed research. 27.2 to >22.4 pts PROFICIENT Describes how a research question reflects social justice and diversity considerations. 22.4 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies but does not describe how a research question reflects social justice and diversity considerations. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe how a research question reflects social justice and diversity considerations. / 32 pts Describe the background and possible causes of a problem, including systemic factors and stakeholders. (C4.GP.B) 32 to >27.2 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes the background and possible causes of a problem, including systemic factors and stakeholders and cites relevant peer-reviewed research. 27.2 to >22.4 pts PROFICIENT Describes the background and possible causes of a problem, including systemic factors and stakeholders. 22.4 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies but does not describe the possible causes of the problem OR does not address systemic factors or stakeholders. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe the background and possible causes of a problem, including systemic factors and stakeholders. / 32 pts Describe the target population for the study, including diversity and intersectionality considerations. (C4.GP.A) 32 to >27.2 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes the target population for the study, including diversity and intersectionality considerations and cites relevant peer-reviewed research. 27.2 to >22.4 pts PROFICIENT Describes the target population for the study, including diversity and intersectionality considerations. 22.4 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies but does not describe the target population for the study, OR the study is missing relevant diversity and intersectionality considerations. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe the target population for the study, including diversity and intersectionality considerations. / 32 pts Create a researcher positionality statement. (C4.GP.A) 32 to >27.2 pts DISTINGUISHED Creates a researcher positionality statement and includes considerations of privilege. 27.2 to >22.4 pts PROFICIENT Creates a researcher positionality statement. 22.4 to >0 pts BASIC Includes some but not all positionality elements. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not create a researcher positionality statement. / 32 pts Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards (C1.GP.C) 40 to >34 pts DISTINGUISHED Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting. 34 to >28 pts PROFICIENT Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. 28 to >0 pts BASIC Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards. / 40 pts