I attached part 1 of the paper and her feedback- For part 2 of your quality/safety paper:
FEEDBACK FROM PART 1-This is a highly significant topic but I am not sure what YOUR problem is– do you LACK standardized processes in your ED that you hope to correct/improve with a quality/safety project? Or do you have a standardized process but a BARRIER (such as accessibility) is the problem which needs to be corrected? For part 2 be sure to focus on the specific PROBLEM that your ED has since you are focusing there.
Review the research literature on how this problem is being addressed (stay within 5 years unless there is nothing more current known (and then state this). You are expected to use CINAHL and PubMed in your search – not relying on google scholar/open journals. A minimum of 5 data-based articles are required. (6 points)
What are the strengths/weaknesses of the studies you reviewed? (5)
From your review, what are the best practices for addressing this topic? (3 points)
Writing/APA 1 point
6 pts
A minimum of 5 data based articles are cited/described accurately
3 pts
5 articles reviewed but not all data based and/or properly described
0 pts
5 articles were not data based and/or very poorly described
/ 6 pts
Strengths/weaknesses
5 pts
Strengths and weaknesses of the 5+ articles accurately described
0 pts
Did not described the strengths and weaknesses of 5+ articles
/ 5 pts
Best practices for your topic?
3 pts
From the review of the literature, states the best practice(s)
0 pts
Does not use the review of the literature and/or does not describe best practice(s)
/ 3 pts
Writing quality
1 pts
No grammatical or APA errors
0 pts
APA and/or grammatical errors
/ 1 pts
Total Points: 0
Choose a submission type
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): annotated-Quality-Safety20Project20Part201docx.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.