Promoting and Implementation of EBP Paper

Week 7 Assignment: Promoting and Implementation of EBP Paper

Submission Type:

Two to three page paper

Details:

1. Selecting EBP Model for your EBP Question
2. Select one of the common EBP models that you think it best fits your PICOT question and then explain/justify your selection considering the following:

• The clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization
• The diagrammatic representation of the model and the ability to assimilate the concepts and organizes the step of the desired EBP changes
• The comprehensiveness of the model from the beginning stages to implementation and evaluation of outcomes
• The easiness of the use when concepts are applied to direct EBP changes and practice issues in clinical settings
• The flexibility of the model to be applied to various populations of patients, EBP projects, initiatives, and programs
• The use and popularity of the model in the published literature

1. This assignment should be no more than 2-3 pages (not including the title or references pages).
2. Common EBP Models:
3. The Stetler Model of Evidence-Based Practice
4. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to promote quality care
5. The Model for Evidence-Based Practice Change
6. The Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close Collaboration (ARCC) model for implementation and sustainability of EBP
7. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework
8. The Clinical Scholar model
9. The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model
10. The ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation

See the rubric for specific grading criteria.

Rubric

Week 7 Selecting EBP Model for your EBP Question Rubric

Week 7 Selecting EBP Model for your EBP Question Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

The selected model

5 pts

Meets expectations

Selects one of the EBP common models

0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Selects uncommon model, or does not select any model

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Models clarity and conciseness

15 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Proficiently analyzes the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and addresses in details how they can support answering their PICOT question

12 pts

Meets Expectations

Analyzes the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and addresses with some details how they can support answering their PICOT question

9 pts

Approaches Expectations

Describes the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and partially addresses how it relates to their PICOT question

3 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Inadequately addresses the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization or does not relate them to their PICOT question

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Models diagrammatic representation

12 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Thoroughly evaluates the model’s diagram, addressing how it enhances understanding and applies to the PICOT question, while discussing its clarity, comprehensiveness, and relevance for clinical practice or evidence-based implementation.

10 pts

Meets Expectations

Describes the diagram, noting its basic features and its connection to the PICOT question, though lacking deep analysis of how the diagram enhances understanding.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

The diagram is mentioned, but the description is vague or lacks connection to the PICOT question.

4 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to provide a meaningful evaluation of the diagram or its relevance to the PICOT question.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Models comprehensiveness

12 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Evaluates how well the model addresses all aspects of the PICOT question (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, time) and explains its broad, holistic approach to solving the clinical problem.

10 pts

Meets Expectations

Assesses how well the model addresses most aspects of the PICOT question, though some elements may not be fully covered.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides limited analysis of how the model covers the PICOT question, with a focus on only a few elements.

4 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not adequately discuss how the model applies to or addresses the PICOT question.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Models easiness

12 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Thoroughly assesses the ease of understanding and applying the model in clinical practice. Considers factors such as simplicity, user-friendliness, and accessibility for healthcare professionals.

10 pts

Meets Expectations

Discusses how easy or difficult the model is to understand and implement but lacks sufficient details regarding its ease of use in clinical settings.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides minimal or unclear evaluation regarding the ease of applying the model.

4 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not address the ease of understanding or applying the model.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Models flexibility

12 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Examines the models adaptability across various clinical settings or populations. Describes how the model can be modified or applied to different situations and still maintain its effectiveness.

10 pts

Meets Expectations

Notes that the model may be flexible but does not explain in detail how it can be applied in diverse settings or populations.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Describes limited flexibility or applies it only to a specific scenario without considering broader applications.

4 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not discuss the flexibility of the model.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Models use and popularity

12 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provides a detailed evaluation of the models current use in practice and its popularity among healthcare professionals. References evidence of its widespread adoption or endorsement in research or clinical settings.

10 pts

Meets Expectations

Mentions the models use in practice but lacks substantial evidence or discussion of its popularity or widespread use.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Briefly addresses the use of the model but lacks depth in discussing its popularity or application in practice.

4 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to provide any meaningful discussion on the models use or popularity.

12 pts

Total Points: 80