Project Two Analysis

Please write me an analysis of my imitation. I will leave the link to the imitation here as well as the rubric. I will also link the original website I based my imitation on

Part 3: Analysis (up to 105 points, broken down as described below): insightfully illustrates and explains the central rhetorical features of the model text. Heres a more detailed breakdown of this portion:

Introduction/Conclusion (20 points):

An introduction that introduces the original text, your process/interest in choosing it, and why you think it works (and how you define works). (5)

Your introduction should also outline the new rhetorical situation for your genre imitation and include a main idea claim (thesis statement) about the rhetorical features you used and why these features were imitated/transformed/changed to make your own text work. (10)

Your conclusion should reflect briefly on how the different rhetorical situations (of both the original piece and your imitation) shaped the similarities and differences in how they approached their genre and worked. (5)

Rhetorical Features (35 points): The body clearly identifies and discusses at least three rhetorical features that imitated or had to adapt for your new rhetorical situation. These body paragraphs should support the main idea claim.

Details (35 points): The discussion on which features were imitated is grounded in specific details, including quotes from the original and your imitation. These details are analyzed to support your main idea claim.

Format and Correctness (up to 15 points): meets formatting requirements for Part 1 and Part 2 (double-spaced, normal-sized font; length expectations); minimizes distracting errors in grammar, syntax, and punctuation. Use MLA or APA-style referencing in the analysis.

The link to the original article: https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/blood-orange-essex-honey/