Assignment Overview:
Upton Sinclairs The Jungle exposed the harsh realities of the meatpacking industry and sparked major Progressive Era reforms. In this assignment, you will analyze the text as a primary source to understand working-class conditions, industrial capitalism, and reform movements in the early 20th century.
Your Task:
Write a 3 page analysis that:
- Identifies Sinclairs purpose in writing The Jungle
- Examines what the text reveals about labor, immigration, poverty, and industrialization
- Explains how this source reflects Progressive Era concerns
- Discusses the impact the book had on policy and public opinion
Uses specific quotes (with page numbers if available)
Rubric
The Jungle Rubric
The Jungle Rubric
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeUnderstanding of Text & Purpose
|
25 to >22.5 PtsExcellentClearly identifies Sinclairs purpose; deeply explains themes of labor, immigration, poverty, industrialization.22.5 to >20.0 PtsProficientAddresses most themes; generally clear understanding.
20 to >17.5 PtsDevelopingLimited explanation; misses key themes.17.5 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementMisinterprets text; missing major elements. |
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProgressive Era Connections
|
15 to >13.5 PtsExcellentStrong explanation of how the book reflects Progressive concerns.13.5 to >12.0 PtsProficientGood connections with minor gaps.
12 to >10.5 PtsDevelopingSurface-level connections.10.5 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementLittle to no connection made. |
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeUse of Quotes & Evidence
|
20 to >18.0 PtsExcellentUses specific quotes with page numbers; evidence strongly supports analysis.18 to >16.0 PtsProficientQuotes used but may lack depth or integration.
16 to >14.0 PtsDevelopingMinimal or general evidence; missing page numbers.14 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementNo textual evidence. |
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeImpact on Policy & Public Opinion
|
15 to >13.5 PtsExcellentThorough explanation of public reaction and policy outcomes (Pure Food & Drug Act, Meat Inspection Act).13.5 to >12.0 PtsProficientSome explanation with minor detail gaps.
12 to >10.5 PtsDevelopingLimited or vague explanation.10.5 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementIncorrect or missing information. |
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeOrganization & Writing Quality
|
15 to >13.5 PtsExcellentClear structure, strong thesis, polished writing.13.5 to >12.0 PtsProficientMostly organized; minor clarity issues.
12 to >10.5 PtsDevelopingSome organization problems; writing inconsistent.10.5 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementDisorganized; hard to follow |
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeFormatting & Requirements
|
10 to >9.0 PtsExcellentClear structure, strong thesis, polished writing.9 to >8.0 PtsProficientMostly organized; minor clarity issues.
8 to >7.0 PtsDevelopingSome organization problems; writing inconsistent.7 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementDisorganized; hard to follow |
10 pts
|
Total points: 100
WRITE MY PAPER
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.