erformance columns.

VALUE: 1.00 VALUE: 2.00 VALUE: 3.00

1. CONTRIBUTION TO DISCIPLINE

THE PROJECT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO IMPACT THE DISCIPLINE/PROFESSION.

APPLICATION OF A TRANSLATION OF EVIDENCE MODEL AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH HAS BEEN USED.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER APPLICATION ARE APPROPRIATE.

2. CONTRIBUTION TO SOCIAL CHANGE

IMPLICATIONS TO SOCIAL CHANGE ARE APPARENT, CLEARLY DISCUSSED, FOLLOW FROM EVIDENCE, AND MAKE SENSE GIVEN THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT.

3. WRITING QUALITY AND PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS

WRITING IS OF DOCTORAL QUALITY, WITHOUT GRAMMATICAL, SPELLING, STYLISTIC, OR OTHER LANGUAGE ERRORS.

ORGANIZATION IS LOGICAL AND TEXT FLOWS SMOOTHLY WITH TRANSITIONS BETWEEN IDEAS.

DOCUMENTATION OF SOURCES MEETS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS.

4. OVERALL ASSESSMENT

PROFESSIONAL TONE, SCHOLARLY VOICE, AND CLINICAL INSIGHT ARE DEMONSTRATED.

CLINICAL DOCTORAL STANDARDS OF QUALITY SCHOLARSHIP ARE MET.

CRITICAL THINKING AND CLINICAL REASONING ARE DEMONSTRATED.

THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IS READY FOR FINAL REVIEW IN MYDR.