For Part 3, complete another group of annotations, just as you did for Part 2. However, this time all of your sources must take the other side of the issue. For example, if you found sources for Part 2 that took the side that individual online freedoms outweighed security needs, its time to take the opposite side and locate sources that argue for security over individual freedom.
Part 2 was consisted of Part 2: First Three Annotations
For Part 2, use the skills you have gained in locating sources to find two credible sources (a peer-reviewed article and a nonacademic source) and one non-credible source on your topic. All three sources should take the same or a similar side on the issue you chose. For example, if you are writing about the balance between individual freedom and online security, your first three sources might all take the side that individual online freedoms should outweigh security needs.
For each sources annotation, provide an APA reference, a brief summary, and a short evaluation. In your evaluation, be sure to respond to the following questions:
- What makes this source credible or not credible?
- How is this source useful to you for your final project, or how would it harm your credibility if you used it in your project?
We are only focusing on part 3 but using the the same questions in part 2 for part 3
My topic I chose was Mandated vaccinations in USA

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.