Pain Clinical map

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical thinking skills

15 ptsLevel 4Questions are logically answered with feasible and acceptable interventions backed by literature.12 ptsLevel 3Questions are answered with feasible and acceptable interventions. Mostly linked with literature

9 ptsLevel 2Questions are answered however interventions are unfeasible or not acceptable. Literature not fully linked or inappropriate.6 ptsLevel 1Questions are mostly unanswered or interventions do not apply.0 ptsLevel 0Assignment not turned in/past due date.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

12 ptsLevel 4Responded to assignment questions with knowledge and insight from literature.9.6 ptsLevel 3Responded to assignment questions with knowledge and insight. Some details missing or 1 question not fully answered.

7.2 ptsLevel 2Responded to questions with insight not linked to literature. 2-3 questions not answered completely.4.8 ptsLevel 1Used opinion to answer questions rather than facts from literature. 4+ questions left unanswered or incomplete.0 ptsLevel 0Assignment not turned in/past due date.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Language

1 ptsLevel 4Excellent use and control of language. Superior use of style and variety provided in a professional tone.0.75 ptsLevel 3Good use and control of language. Minor (<2) errors with use of style with some variety provided. Professional tone maintained throughout.

0.5 ptsLevel 2Average use and control of language. Some (3-5) errors or misuse of style with minimal variety. Professional tone maintained throughout.0.25 ptsLevel 1Below average use and control of language. Significant (>5) errors or misuses of style with no variety. Professional tone not maintained throughout assignment.0 ptsLevel 0Significant issues with use and control of language. Style and variety unable to be determined with no professional tone.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting

1 ptsLevel 4Formatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) used with no errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with no errors.0.75 ptsLevel 3Formatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) with minimal (<2) errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with minimal (<2) errors.

0.5 ptsLevel 2Formatting mostly follows assignment directions (APA as required) with some (3-5) errors. Citations (if necessary) provided with some (3-5) errors.0.25 ptsLevel 1Formatting (APA as required) errors (>5) make following the assignment difficult. Citations (if necessary) mostly provided with significant (>5) errors.0 ptsLevel 0Formatting does not follow assignment directions. Significant errors make formatting illegible. Citations (if necessary) do not follow APA format.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly/Professional Composition

1 ptsLevel 4Expert level of writing with little to no errors.0.75 ptsLevel 3Good level of writing with minimal (<2) errors.

0.5 ptsLevel 2Average level of writing with some (3-5) errors.0.25 ptsLevel 1Below average level of writing with significant (>5) errors.0 ptsLevel 0Level of writing is far below what is expected for scholarly/professional composition.

1 pts