New Theory Paper

Write a master’s-level, 2,000-word double-spaced academic theory paper using footnotes (Chicago Manual of Style), Times New Roman 12-point font, use active voice, with a title, and answering the following questions. Utilize ideas and concepts from the theory and theorists (i.e., Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, etc.), evaluate the use of military power by the U.S. to achieve its political aims during the First Gulf War. What political aims did the U.S. seek? Did the U.S. use its military power effectively? If so, what demonstrates this? If not, why not? Use the attached articles as references, the sample paper outline, and the introductory template below and rubric for assessment. Ensure no used of AI detection and provide citations.

The paper should evaluate military theories and their applicability to joint warfighting in globally integrated operations in pursuit of national political aims.

Formatting instructions:

The body of the paper will be double-spaced, use Times New Roman 12-point font, and have 1-inch margins (top, bottom, left, and right).

Use footnotes (not endnotes) for citations in Chicago Manual of Style format; use Arabic rather than Roman numerals. Do not include a bibliography. Consult the Chicago Manual of Style quick citation guide.

A labeled introductory paragraph that at a minimum: 1) provides a clear easily identifiable thesis that answers the assigned question, and 2) outlines the arguments presented in support of the proposed thesis. These arguments can be numbered for ease of recognition. The paper may have as many or as few arguments as necessary for answering the question. Keep in mind the paper length when deciding this.

The paper should have the following:

A clear thesis that directly answers the question. The key element here: Did the

U.S. use its power effectively?

A clear political aim that provides a foundation for the argument. One means of evaluating the effectiveness of the U.S. use of power its power is to evaluate whether or not the U.S. achieved its political aims in the war examined, and how effective or not its leaders were in developing and implementing strategy and operations to achieve this aim or aims. Clear arguments, each examined in its own labeled section

supporting the thesis and are tied to it.

Developed arguments containing clear and substantive analysis while integrating relevant theoretical concepts.

Satisfactory use of provided materials and/or other sources.

A clear, labeled conclusion of at least one paragraph revealing the value and importance of what has been examined in the paper.

Sample Paper Outline

Introduction:

One paragraph.

This includes a clear thesis that directly answers the assigned question.

It also includes the arguments that will be addressed in the paper.

These arguments serve as the outline to the paper.

It is not necessary to provide background information.

Supporting Argument #1:

State your supporting argument and develop it using evidence from your readings.

The argument presented here should be linked back to the thesis.

Supporting Argument #2:

Follow the same approach as for Supporting Argument #1.

Supporting Argument #3:

Follow the same approach as for Supporting Argument #1 and #2.

Supporting arguments as needed:

Paper length restrictions mean it will be rare to have more than three arguments. Two may also be sufficient.

Conclusion:

One paragraph explaining what should be learned from the analysis presented.

Heres an example of the introductory paragraph template.

The United States employed military power in the Pacific Theater during the Second

World War to achieve its political aim of Japans constitutional surrender. The

U.S. waged a Corbettian campaign that: 1) prioritized control of maritime communications rather than decisive fleet battle alone; 2) used sea and air power to enable the progressive isolation of Japan; and 3) translated maritime and air control

into political coercion by incrementally restricting Japans freedom of action

until surrender became unavoidable.

ASSESSMENT RUBRIC

LEARNING OUTCOMES: Evaluate the use of military power by the U.S. to achieve its political aims during the Second World War (in the European and/or Pacific Theaters), the

Korean War, the Vietnam War, or the First Gulf War.

An insightful thesis revealing a particularly imaginative treatment of the question.

A clear political aim and concise explanation of its importance and/or value

Multiple, exceptional, clearly articulated arguments linked clearly to the thesis and possessed of exceptional – arguably original analysis.

Exceptional, insightful- perhaps original – arguments providing a superb, substantive answer to the question while creatively integrating ideas, theory, and examples of historical joint warfighting into a coherent analysis.

Exceptional use of provided materials and/or other sources.

An exceptional conclusion that distills the essence of the paper while conveying further valuable lessons, particularly for joint warfighting.

CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING

Clear and comprehensive application of theory.

Comprehensive analysis of exceptional sources.

Unique yet plausible explanation of how military theory explains actions or fails to.

Effective use of prior learning applied to a new context.

SHORT WRITING: Purpose, Thesis & Content

Exceptionally clear and refined purpose and thesis.

Exceptionally developed arguments clearly connected to the thesis and form part of a whole.

Logical analytical approach presenting superb analysis of both theoretical ideas and historical events, thus enhancing the lessons learned by examining the topic chosen.

SHORT WRITING: Organization & Structure

Logic of approach is clear and easy to follow reflecting a sophisticated analysis and argumentation.

Paragraphs & transitions are creative & persuasive and substantially enhance main points.

WRITING: Sources & Evidence

Skillful use of high-quality, credible, relevant sources

Citations and references are formatted correctly.

WRITING: Language, Syntax & Mechanics

Clear & concise language skillfully communicates meaning to readers.

Main points are clearly identified

All sentences are well-written with varied sentence structure.

Virtually free of errors in grammar, punctuation & spelling.

Visual aids (i.e., figures / tables) are used (as needed) to greatly enhance assignment (no spelling errors, concise, readable).