Assignment Question: A corporation can only act through its directors, officers, and employees. Does the justification for corporate criminal responsibility make sense? Are there any specific exceptions where it should be used? In your opinion, would it be better to not hold corporations criminally responsible in favor of criminally prosecuting the corporate employees who committed the crimes? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?
Resources:
Chapter 7
This chapter discusses how the government uses the criminal justice system to enforce criminal responsibility for corporate misconduct.
Fisher: Corporate Criminal Liability:
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Rakoff The Financial Crisis.pdf, DOJ Announces Changes to WCC Enforcement.docx, ALL v SUBSTL.docx, CHAPTER 7.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.