MGT350 Week 5

For CT 5 using your individual career perspective, describe the corporate-level strategies used at your company. What strategies are used by your area/functional unit? Do these area/functional unit strategies support the corporate-level strategies of the wider organization or are the areas/functional unit strategies unique? Describe your companys international involvement. Critique the entry strategy(ies) that was/were used to enter foreign markets. Compare and contrast the strategic management process used by your company for its domestic organization and its international organization. How important is it to you that you work at an organization with an international presence? Your paper should be 5-6 pages in length and align with APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (available in the left-hand navigation panel). Include at least 2 credible references including the course textbook. The CSU Global Library is a good place to find these references (available in the left-hand navigation panel).

MGT350_M05_CT

MGT350_M05_CT

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Requirements

20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all the required components as specified in the assignment.

16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Content

30 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the course material; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

24 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

18 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Critical Analysis

30 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

CLO1: Describes the strategic management process for both domestic organizations and international organizations.

24 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

18 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

12 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Sources / Examples

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least two credible sources as specified in description. Sources meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates two credible sources as specified in description. Sources meet required criteria but are lessthan adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates one credible source as specified in description. Source is poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources. Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style

5 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

4 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

3 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

2 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Demonstrates proper use of APA style

5 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.

4 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.

2 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.

5 p