To review the assignment information below, click on the document name to view or download the document. Scroll to view or download the embedded rubric.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. For more information about Turnitin, click .
LUO Submission Policy
The first submission of this assignment will be used for grading. If you need an exception to this policy, please contact your faculty member.
Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module 5: Week 5.
| Team Management Grading Rubric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Describe each concept, discuss their strengths and weaknesses, and summarize their effectiveness toward producing synergy. |
60 to >49 pts Advanced Thoroughly described each concept, discussed their strengths and weaknesses, summarizing their effectiveness toward producing synergy. 49 to >10 pts Proficient Satisfactorily described each concept, discussed their strengths and weaknesses, summarizing their effectiveness toward producing synergy. 10 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently described each concept, discussed their strengths and weaknesses, summarizing their effectiveness toward producing synergy. 0 pts Not Present Did not describe each concept, discuss their strengths and weaknesses, or summarize their effectiveness toward producing synergy. |
/ 60 pts |
|
Biblical integration provided regarding team management from the Bible or Christian literature. |
15 to >10 pts Advanced Biblical integration thoroughly provided regarding team management from the Bible or Christian literature. 10 to >5 pts Proficient Biblical integration satisfactorily provided regarding team management from the Bible or Christian literature. 5 to >0 pts Developing Biblical integration insufficiently provided regarding team management from the Bible or Christian literature. 0 pts Not Present Biblical integration not provided. |
/ 15 pts |
|
Abstract |
10 to >8 pts Advanced Thoroughly articulated a clear and comprehensive overview of the papers content, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms, and a biblical application are included. 8 to >5 pts Proficient Satisfactorily articulated some critical components of the paper, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and a biblical application are included. 5 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently articulated critical components of the paper linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and biblical application are not sufficient. 0 pts Not Present Did not present concepts clearly. Did not provide a comprehensive overview of the papers content. Missing a link to management. No focus on your findings. Missing key terms and a biblical application. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Introduction |
10 to >8 pts Advanced Thoroughly presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section. 8 to >5 pts Proficient Satisfactorily presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section. 5 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is missing from your introduction section. 0 pts Not Present Did not present a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A thesis statement is missing from your introduction section. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Conclusion |
10 to >8 pts Advanced Thoroughly stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction. 8 to >5 pts Proficient Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction. 5 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction. 0 pts Not Present Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Mechanics, Composition & Word Count |
15 to >10 pts Advanced Mechanics, composition, and word count is thorough. 10 to >5 pts Proficient Mechanics, composition, and word count is satisfactory. 5 to >0 pts Developing Mechanics, composition, and word count is insufficient. 0 pts Not Present There are many errors in mechanics, composition, and word count. |
/ 15 pts |
|
APA Formatting |
10 to >8 pts Advanced APA formatting is thorough. 8 to >5 pts Proficient APA formatting is satisfactory. 5 to >0 pts Developing APA formatting is insufficient. 0 pts Not Present APA formatting does not exist. |
/ 10 pts |
|
References |
5 to >3 pts Advanced References meet requirements in number and quality. 3 to >1 pts Proficient References almost meet requirements in number and quality. 1 to >0 pts Developing References do not meet requirements in number and quality. 0 pts Not Present Missing references. |
/ 5 pts |
|
Citations |
15 to >10 pts Advanced All statements are supported by citations. 10 to >5 pts Proficient Many statements are supported by citations. 5 to >0 pts Developing Some statements are supported by citations. 0 pts Not Present Citations are rare, repetitious, or non-existent. |
/ 15 pts |
| Total Points: 0 | ||
Requirements: 5 PAGES

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.