Literature Review Section

PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS, AND DONT CHANGE THE SOURCES ATTACHED.

Objective

• Implement research for your project

Deliverables

• Write a 5-6 page (not including the title and reference pages)
• APA-formatted paper with an introduction and conclusion
• APA headings for each section of the paper
• At least 5 peer-reviewed references

Step 1: Capstone Project

• Write a thorough literature review paper

Step 2: Consider

• Subheadings (Themes Discovered In Review)
• Notice Of Gaps In Knowledge
• At least 5 references within 5 years and peer-reviewed.

Step 3: Write

• Write a paper that addresses the current literature for your project.
• Use the template attached below.

PLEASE READ

Assignment instructions

PLEASE TAKE NOTE

All assignments must include and align with the PICOT question for the proposed project in the first paragraph.

Always put your full approved PICOT question that includes the percentage of the outcome in the first paragraph and on your templates or you will lose points.

2. For the references – CDC, The WHO, ANA are not scholarly Peer reviewed articles. They are good resources but DO NOT count towards the required number for each assignment. They can be used as an extra resource for great information.

3. References must have a URL or doi link for verification of the article or you will not get credit for them.

PREVIOUS WORK IS ATTACHED PLEASE FOLLOW ALL INTRUCTIONS AND FOLLOW RUBRIC BELOW FOR FULL POINTS

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Intentional Learning and Reflection

15 pts

Exemplary

Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Decision Making and Clinical Reasoning

15 pts

Exemplary

Provides compelling and accurate evidence to support in-depth analysis to the central position beyond the required (2) research sources with at least 1 source from a periodical database. Research sources are highly relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable and add to the strength of the content.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization & Presentation

15 pts

Exemplary

Content is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, and spacing are optimal for audience viewing

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Writing and APA Formatting

15 pts

Exemplary

Content is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references that are written correctly.