This is the Rubric and NO AI please, I need a report attached
Rubric:
| Criteria | Excellent (90-100) | Good (75-89) | Satisfactory (60-74) | Needs Improvement (0-59) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structure & Format | Letter follows formal business format with correct layout, proper salutation, and closing. | Letter has minor formatting issues but generally follows business letter format. | Letter has some formatting issues. | Letter does not follow business letter format. |
| Content & Relevance | Includes a clear, concise introduction, body, and conclusion, with relevant examples linked to course content. | Content is mostly relevant, with some missing details or slight deviations from course concepts. | Content lacks depth, with minimal reference to course materials. | Content is poorly developed or off-topic, lacking references to course materials. |
| Use of Course Concepts | Demonstrates a strong understanding and integration of concepts from weeks 1 and 2, including leadership, communication, and business ethics. | Incorporates course concepts well but lacks full depth or clear application. | Limited application of course concepts with only surface-level understanding. | No clear connection to course materials or concepts. |
| Professionalism | Highly professional tone, clear language, no errors. | Professional tone with minor grammatical or typographical errors. | Occasional errors in tone or language, but generally professional. | Unprofessional tone, with frequent errors or unclear language. |
| Self-Reflection | Thoughtful and detailed reflection on how course concepts were applied. | Reflection is clear but lacks depth or specific examples. | Basic reflection with minimal connection to course concepts. | No or very weak reflection on course concepts. |
Requirements: about 1.5 pages

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.