Health literacy assessment

Please explain the pamphlet to a fifth grader using the smog information and the rubric. also attach the pamphlet and the smog picture into this essay.

STEPS: Analyzed, evaluated, and explained all three components of the SMOG Analysis for each of the risk populations. Analyze the results and present report findings. Evaluate the appropriateness of the literacy level of the education resource for the three identified at risk populations. Explain and justify SMOG recommendations to enhance the readability of the educational material for the three identified at risk populations.

RUBRIC:

NSG 3480 Health Literacy AssessmentCriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Health Literacy Defined with scholarly source. CSLO 4

threshold: 1515 pts

Excellent – The definition of health literacy is thorough and is supported by professional/ scholarly source.

12 pts

Satisfactory – The definition of health literacy is minimal, but is supported by professional/ scholarly source.

9 pts

Needs Improvement – The definition of health literacy is provided, but is not supported by professional/ scholarly source.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory – The definition of health literacy is not provided.

/ 15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Impact Analyze the impact of low literacy on health promotion and health education with a scholarly source. CSLO 1, 3, 4

threshold: 2020 pts

Excellent – The analysis of the impact of low literacy on health promotion and health education is thorough and is supported by professional/ scholarly source.

15 pts

Satisfactory – The analysis of the impact of low literacy on health promotion is minimal, but is supported by professional/ scholarly source.

12 pts

Needs Improvement – The analysis of the impact of low literacy on health promotion and health education is provided, but is not supported by professional/ scholarly source.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory – The analysis of the impact of low literacy on health promotion and health education is not provided.

/ 20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

At Risk Populations Identify three at risk populations utilizing community demographics and risk factors. CSLO 1, 3, 5

threshold: 2525 pts

Excellent – Identified and discussed three at risk populations for low health literacy utilizing community demographics and risk factors.

19 pts

Satisfactory – Identified and discussed two at risk populations for low health literacy utilizing community demographics and risk factors.

15 pts

Needs Improvement – Identified and discussed one at risk populations for low health literacy utilizing community demographics and risk factors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory – Did not identify or discuss at risk populations or did not utilize community demographics and risk factors.

/ 25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

SMOG Analysis

view longer description

threshold: 3030 pts

Excellent – Analyzed, evaluated, and explained all three components of the SMOG Analysis for each of the risk populations. Analyze the results and present report findings. Evaluate the appropriateness of the literacy level of the education resource for the three identified at risk populations. Explain and justify SMOG recommendations to enhance the readability of the educational material for the three identified at risk populations.

23 pts

Satisfactory – Analyzed, evaluated, and explained only two components of the SMOG Analysis for each of the risk populations. Analyze the results and present report findings. Evaluate the appropriateness of the literacy level of the education resource for the three identified at risk populations. Explain and justify SMOG recommendations to enhance the readability of the educational material for the three identified at risk populations.

18 pts

Needs Improvement – Analyzed, evaluated, and explained only one component of the SMOG Analysis for each of the risk populations. Analyze the results and present report findings. Evaluate the appropriateness of the literacy level of the education resource for the three identified at risk populations. Explain and justify SMOG recommendations to enhance the readability of the educational material for the three identified at risk populations.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory – The SMOG analysis, evaluation, and explanation has not provided.

/ 30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Grammar, Spelling, and APA formatting

view longer description

threshold: 1010 pts

Excellent – Skillful and proficient writing using appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting of the title page, running head, page numbers, headings in the body of the paper, appropriate in-text reference citations, and reference page. Written in 2-3 double spaced pages.

8 pts

Satisfactory – Uses appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting of the title page, headers, page numbers, headings in the body of the paper, appropriate in-text reference citations, and reference page with a few errors or lapses. Written in 2-3 double spaced pages.

6 pts

Needs Improvement – Uses appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting of the title page, headers, page numbers, headings in the body of the paper, appropriate in-text reference citations, and reference page with a moderate number of errors or lapses. Written in less than 2 or greater than 3 double spaced pages.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory -Does not write effectively using appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting.

/ 10 pts