Global health comparison Canada vs. United States

Hi Attached in the file is my GLobal Signature Assignment instructions. If you have any question please let me know. The paper will compare and contrast the above topics to the country of choice vs. the United States The country of my choice will be Canada vs. the United States. I AM TAKING MY MSN IN NURSING AND MY SPECIALTY IS EMERGENCY MEDICINE. Thanks! Here is the rubric for my paper. Signature Assignment 70 pts Signature Assignment 70 pts Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis Statement Thesis statement reflecting reasons for working hypothesis and presenting argument and purpose 10 pts Exemplary (E) Exemplary (E) Student composes exceptional introduction that grabs reader’s interest and states topic. Thesis is exceptionally clear, arguable, well-developed, and a definitive statement. The writer’s central purpose is readily apparent to the reader. 0 pts No Marks 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality and Relevance of Evidence, Research- based evidence Research- based evidence 10 pts Exemplary (E) Exemplary (E) Student’s paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and historically accurate. Included information clearly relates to the thesis. References include journals or other approved sources (e.g., government documents, agency manuals, …). The reader is confident that the information and ideas can be trusted. 0 pts No Marks 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport of Thesis/Analysis 10 pts Exemplary (E) Student’s writing reflects exceptionally critical, relevant and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Essay includes excellent analysis and compelling evidence from professionally legitimate sources that support claims. Attribution is clear and fairly represented. 0 pts No Marks 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis of Knowledge 10 pts Exemplary (E) Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements. 0 pts No Marks 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources Relevance, Scope, Credibility 10 pts Exemplary (E) Student’s research includes 10 or more current sources, of which at least 3 are journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative. 0 pts No Marks 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Knowledge Critical Thinking Skills 5 pts Exemplary (E) Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall foRrmat of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates students ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence. 0 pts No Marks 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle/Formatting consistency of style APA, 7th edition across essay in its entirety. 5 pts Exemplary (E) Student’s entries are entirely correct as to use of chosen format. Student’s essay conforms to rules for formatting and citation of sources are perfect. 0 pts No Marks 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization/Word Choice/Grammar Standards/Conventions I. Organization II. Word choice III. Grammar/Usage and Mechanics 8 pts Exemplary (E) ORGANIZATION: Writer demonstrates logical and subtle sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organization. WORD CHOICE: Chosen words are consistently precise and accurate. GRAMMAR/USAGE AND MECHANICS: The writing is free or almost free of errors. 0 pts No Marks 8 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength 8-10 pages 2 pts Exemplary (E) Paper is the number of pages specified in the assignment. 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeILO 2 Competency 2.1 Cultural self-awareness threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Demonstrates deep self-awareness, clearly articulating how the writer’s own cultural background, beliefs, and biases influence their interactions and perceptions. Provides specific, thoughtful examples of self-growth or challenges related to cultural self-awareness. 3 pts Proficient Shows good self-awareness, identifying how the writers cultural background influences their perceptions. Some examples may lack depth or specificity, but self-awareness is evident. 2 pts Competent Demonstrates limited self-awareness, with vague or general statements about the writers cultural background and its influence. Lacks specific examples or depth of analysis. 1 pts Beginning Shows minimal or no cultural self-awareness, with little discussion of the writers own background or its impact on their views and interactions. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeILO 2 Competency 2.2 Depth of Understanding and Awareness of Cultural Diversity threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Demonstrates a profound understanding of cultural diversity, with nuanced and insightful analysis of diverse perspectives, traditions, and values. The writer connects their understanding to personal experiences or relevant examples. 3 pts Proficient Shows a solid understanding of cultural diversity with clear analysis. Some perspectives or examples may lack depth or detail, but the overall understanding is strong. 2 pts Competent Demonstrates a basic understanding of cultural diversity, but the analysis is surface-level or lacks concrete examples and connections. 1 pts Beginning Shows minimal understanding or awareness of cultural diversity, with little to no analysis or examples to support understanding. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeILO 2 Competency 2.3 Critical Analysis and Communication Across Cultures threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Provides a thoughtful and critical analysis of the writers ability to communicate effectively across cultures, with specific examples illustrating strengths and areas for growth. The tone is inclusive and self-reflective. 3 pts Proficient Provides a clear analysis of communication across cultures, but examples may lack depth, or the self-reflection may not be fully developed. 2 pts Competent Attempts to analyze communication across cultures, but the discussion is vague or overly general, with few concrete examples. 1 pts Beginning Lacks meaningful analysis of communication across cultures, with no clear examples or self-reflection — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeILO 2 Competency 2.4 Demonstration of Empathy and Sensitivity to Cultural Differences threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Clearly illustrates the writers ability to empathize and demonstrate sensitivity toward cultural differences, with specific, meaningful examples and self-awareness. 3 pts Proficient Demonstrates empathy and sensitivity but may lack depth in examples or show minor gaps in self-awareness. 2 pts Competent Includes some mention of empathy or sensitivity but lacks detail, self-awareness, or examples. 1 pts Beginning Does not adequately demonstrate empathy or sensitivity toward cultural differences, with little to no supporting examples. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeILO 2 Competency 2.5 Application of Cultural Competence in Practice threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Effectively describes how cultural competence has been or will be applied in real-world situations. Examples are specific, actionable, and well-connected to broader concepts of cultural competence. 3 pts Proficietn Includes examples of applying cultural competence but lacks detail or specificity in connecting these examples to broader concepts. 2 pts Competent Mentions applying cultural competence but provides vague or underdeveloped examples, lacking connection to practice. 1 pts Beginning Does not address or poorly addresses the application of cultural competence, with no examples or actionable insights. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 1.1e Translate evidence from nursing science as well as other sciences into practice threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Skillfully translates evidence from nursing and other sciences into practice, consistently improving patient outcomes. 3 pts Proficient Competently applies evidence from nursing and other sciences to practice, with occasional gaps in effectiveness. 2 pts Competent Shows some ability to translate evidence into practice, but with inconsistent application. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to apply evidence to practice, with frequent gaps in translation. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 1.1f Demonstrate the application of nursing science to practice. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Demonstrates exemplary application of nursing science to practice, integrating advanced concepts seamlessly. 3 pts Proficient Applies nursing science effectively to practice, with minor gaps in integration. 2 pts Competent Attempts to apply nursing science, with noticeable gaps in practical integration. 1 pts Beginning Fails to effectively apply nursing science to practice. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 1.2g Apply a systematic and defendable approach to nursing practice decisions threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Applies a systematic and defendable approach to practice decisions, consistently demonstrating critical thinking. 3 pts Proficient Uses a systematic approach to practice decisions, though defense of decisions may be less robust. 2 pts Competent Attempts to apply a systematic approach, with some inconsistency in decision-making. 1 pts Beginning Lacks a systematic approach to practice decisions, leading to frequent errors. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 1.2i Demonstrate socially responsible leadership threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Demonstrates leadership that is socially responsible, positively influencing both practice and community. 3 pts Proficient Shows strong leadership with social responsibility, though impact may be uneven. 2 pts Competent Demonstrates emerging leadership skills, with some social 1 pts Beginning Lacks evidence of socially responsible leadership. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 1.3d Integrate foundational and advanced specialty knowledge into clinical reasoning. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Seamlessly integrates foundational and advanced specialty knowledge into clinical reasoning, consistently improving patient care. 3 pts Proficient Effectively integrates knowledge into clinical reasoning, though may lack depth in certain areas. 2 pts Competent Shows emerging ability to integrate knowledge, with noticeable gaps in reasoning. 1 pts Beginning Fails to integrate knowledge effectively, leading to poor clinical reasoning. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 1.3e Synthesize current and emerging evidence to influence practice threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Exemplifies synthesis of current and emerging evidence to influence and innovate in practice. 3 pts Proficient Competently synthesizes evidence to influence practice, though with less innovation. 2 pts Competent Shows some ability to synthesize evidence, with limited impact on practice. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to synthesize evidence effectively, leading to minimal influence on practice. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 2.3h Demonstrate that ones practice is informed by a comprehensive assessment appropriate to the functional area of advanced nursing practice. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Practice is consistently informed by thorough and comprehensive assessments relevant to advanced nursing practice. 3 pts Proficient Practice is generally informed by assessments, though occasional gaps may occur. 2 pts Competent Demonstrates some reliance on assessments, but lacks comprehensiveness. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to ensure practice is informed by comprehensive assessments. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 2.5i Prioritize risk mitigation strategies to prevent or reduce adverse outcomes. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Prioritizes and implements risk mitigation strategies that consistently reduce adverse outcomes. 3 pts Proficient Effectively prioritizes risk mitigation, though with occasional gaps in implementation. 2 pts Competent Attempts to mitigate risks, but with inconsistent effectiveness. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to prioritize or implement risk mitigation strategies. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.1j Assess the efficacy of a systems capability to serve a target sub-populations healthcare needs. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Conducts comprehensive and precise assessments, effectively identifying strengths and weaknesses in the system’s ability to meet sub-population needs. 3 pts Proficient Performs accurate assessments, recognizing most key aspects of system efficacy, with minor gaps in depth or detail. 2 pts Competent Assesses system capability with some accuracy but lacks depth, failing to fully identify key strengths and weaknesses. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to assess system efficacy, showing limited understanding of sub-population healthcare needs. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.1k Analyze primary and secondary population health data for multiple populations against relevant benchmarks. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Skillfully analyzes data, identifying trends, disparities, and aligning findings with relevant benchmarks to drive evidence-based decisions. 3 pts Proficient Analyzes data accurately, identifying key trends and discrepancies, with minor inconsistencies in alignment with benchmarks. 2 pts Competent Analyzes data but with limited depth or connection to benchmarks; occasionally misinterprets findings. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to analyze population health data effectively, with minimal reference to benchmarks. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.1l Use established or evolving methods to determine population-focused priorities for care. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Expertly utilizes both established and emerging methods to accurately determine and prioritize population-focused care, demonstrating innovative thinking and adaptability. 3 pts Proficient Effectively uses established methods to prioritize care, with some exploration of emerging approaches; priorities generally align well with population needs. 2 pts Competent Shows basic use of established methods to determine care priorities but lacks depth and understanding of emerging methods. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to use appropriate methods to determine care priorities, leading to misalignment with population health needs. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.1m Develop a collaborative approach with relevant stakeholders to address population healthcare needs, including evaluation methods. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Establishes and leads highly effective collaborative partnerships, ensuring inclusive and culturally responsive healthcare strategies. 3 pts Proficient Engages in productive collaborations, contributing to the development of responsive healthcare approaches. 2 pts Competent Participates in stakeholder collaborations with some effectiveness but lacks initiative or leadership. 1 pts Beginning Limited involvement in collaborative efforts; struggles to develop effective stakeholder partnerships. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.1n Collaborate with appropriate stakeholders to implement a sociocultural and linguistically responsive intervention plan. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Leads the development and implementation of comprehensive, culturally sensitive intervention plans, ensuring inclusivity and responsiveness. Effectively collaborates with a diverse range of stakeholders. 3 pts Proficient Collaborates effectively to develop and implement intervention plans that are generally culturally sensitive and linguistically responsive. 2 pts Competent Engages in collaboration to develop intervention plans but shows limited sensitivity to cultural or linguistic needs; effectiveness is variable. 1 pts Beginning Fails to collaborate effectively or consider sociocultural and linguistic needs in intervention planning, resulting in ineffective or insensitive strategies. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.2g Lead partnerships to improve population health outcomes. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Leads multi-sectoral partnerships with significant, measurable impact on improving population health outcomes. 3 pts Proficient Demonstrates active and effective leadership in partnerships with clear contributions to health outcomes. 2 pts Competent Engages in partnerships with some contributions to improving health outcomes. 1 pts Beginning Minimal involvement in partnerships with limited or no contribution to health outcomes. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.3f Incorporate ethical principles in resource allocation in achieving equitable health. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Demonstrates leadership in ensuring ethical resource allocation, prioritizing equitable health outcomes for all. 3 pts Proficient Consistently incorporates ethical principles in decision-making about resource allocation. 2 pts Competent Recognizes and applies ethical principles inconsistently in resource decisions. 1 pts Beginning Minimal or no consideration of ethical principles in resource allocation decisions. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.4f Identify opportunities to influence the policy process. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Thoroughly identifies diverse opportunities to influence the policy process, incorporating interdisciplinary approaches and stakeholder engagement. 3 pts Proficient Identifies relevant opportunities to influence the policy process, focusing on key areas of policy change. 2 pts Competent Identifies some opportunities but lacks depth in interdisciplinary approaches or stakeholder engagement. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to identify opportunities, with minimal understanding of the policy process. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.4j Assess the impact of policy changes. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Conducts comprehensive assessments of policy impacts, incorporating diverse stakeholder perspectives and rigorous analysis. 3 pts Proficient Assesses policy changes with a focus on outcomes and stakeholder perspectives, but with less depth or breadth. 2 pts Competent Assesses policy impacts but lacks rigor or fails to incorporate multiple stakeholder perspectives. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to assess impacts, providing minimal analysis or understanding of policy outcomes. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.4k Evaluate the ability of policy to address disparities and inequities within segments of the population. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Thoroughly evaluates the capacity of policies to address disparities, using data-driven analysis and critical reflection on equity issues. 3 pts Proficient Evaluates policy effectiveness in addressing disparities but lacks depth in data use or critical reflection. 2 pts Competent Makes basic evaluations of policy impact on disparities but lacks significant depth or understanding of equity issues. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to evaluate the effectiveness of policy in addressing disparities, with little awareness of equity considerations. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 3.5i Demonstrate leadership skills to promote advocacy efforts that include principles of social justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Exemplifies leadership by integrating principles of social justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion into all advocacy efforts, demonstrating clear ethical leadership. 3 pts Proficient Demonstrates leadership in promoting advocacy efforts aligned with social justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion, though with some gaps in practical implementation. 2 pts Competent Demonstrates basic leadership with an awareness of social justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion but lacks depth or clear action plans. 1 pts Beginning Struggles to demonstrate leadership, showing limited understanding or application of social justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion in advocacy efforts. — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAACN MSNCompetency 4.1h Apply and critically evaluate advanced knowledge in a defined area of nursing practice. threshold: 3.0 pts 4 pts Exemplary Demonstrates exceptional ability to develop a comprehensive and innovative research project or EBP initiative. Clearly defines objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes with thorough rationale. 3 pts Proficient Effectively develops a well-structured research project or EBP initiative. Defines objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes with appropriate rationale. 2 pts Competent… [Content truncated to 3000 words]

WRITE MY PAPER