Following the work I hired you to complete, I’m asked to mak…

following the work I hired you to conduct for me in December.Some issues have been detected that need to be updated and corrected as seen in the comments below and instructions:

DELAYED

Submit your comments to the Reviewer(s) and re-submit a new version of your manuscript. Manuscript quality indicators are available to all participants in the tab to facilitate the peer review process.

You are late to respond to Reviewer 1 and/or resubmit a new version of your manuscript.

EVALUATION

Q 1

Please list your revision requests for the authors and provide your detailed comments, including highlighting limitations and strengths of the study and evaluating the validity of the evidence. If you have additional comments based on Q2 and Q3 you can add them as well.

Reviewer 1 | 27 Dec 2025 | 14:11

#1

The strength of this research is evident in its compelling title, which links “Recognition and Omission” in environmental protection within the framework of environmental policy in the Congo. As we know, environmental conflicts in Africa are often overlooked, so this research will serve as an example for the continued development of environmental regulations that support human rights and the rights of nature, both animals and plants. It is a reminder that the current state of the earth is unfavorable, so research like this must continue to be developed and disseminated.

A limitation of this research is that the author also needs to refine the analysis specifically, such as adding the concept of environmental justice theory to the discussion related to the implementation of environmental policy. This should then be linked to the most relevant policy theory for application in this situation. It must be understood that the key to successful environmental policy is the principle of justice, where all parties benefit equally. If the implemented policy results only benefit one party, such as the government, the regulation is irrelevant because the end result is unfair. Therefore, it is necessary to emphasize the crucial role of policymakers in government: they must be people with sincere morals and fairness so they can carry out their duties according to their functions and capacities. Upholding justice is a key component in developing sustainable regulations for a better environmental future.

This research also makes recommendations, such as adding necessary evaluation and monitoring to the ongoing environmental policy process. This process should be monitored by a dedicated, independent team, not affiliated with the government, to ensure neutrality in two-way communication, which can act as a bridge to resolving conflicts. It is also hoped that other authors, interested in this Environmental Policy Study, will follow up in the future to provide further guidance in implementing appropriate environmental policies.

Guest Associate Editor: Peter Larsen | 11 Feb 2026 | 19:51

#2

Dear Reviewer, many thanks for these thoughtful comments. I look forward to the author perspective. The only limitation is one of space making it somewhat difficult to add further theoretical ideas as it is an opinion piece. many thanks. best, Peter Larsen

Q 2

Check List

Reviewer 1 | 27 Dec 2025 | 14:11

#1

a. Is the quality of the figures and tables satisfactory?

Yes

b. Does the manuscript provide an appropriate context for a non-technical audience?

Yes

c. Does the manuscript use language that can be understood by a non-technical audience?

Yes

d. Are the actionable recommendations provided based on the evidence?

Yes

e. Are the actionable recommendations provided reasonable and feasible?

Yes

f. Are there any ethical issues with the recommendations provided?

No