FBE 41

-masters level work -plagiarism under 2% -complete sentences for each question with great descriptions -proper in text citations and references -put all work in PDF below -subject is Physical Education 9/12 which they were doing activity stations and studying for there unit test -rubric is below TFE 800.41 Rubric TFE 800.41 Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 1 List at least three specific lesson objectives from your time in the classroom for this field experience. What specific things did the teacher do to meet the objectives? Describe the overall instruction and learning process you observed as well as specific details for each of the three or more objectives. 100 pts Exemplary Provides a thorough list of at least three clear, specific lesson objectives. Offers a detailed explanation of how the teacher met each objective, with concrete examples of instructional strategies, activities, and student responses. Describes the overall instruction process with depth, offering insights into how the teacher effectively facilitated learning and engaged students in meaningful ways. Demonstrates strong understanding of lesson objectives and the teaching strategies used to achieve them. 0 pts No Credit Lists fewer than three lesson objectives or the objectives provided are unclear or irrelevant. Offers little to no explanation of how the teacher worked to meet the objectives, with few or no specific examples. The overall instruction process is poorly described or missing. Shows little to no understanding of how the teacher met lesson objectives. 100 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 Describe how you saw the teacher use Blooms Taxonomy over the five hours of class time. Where did they use lower-level and higher-level categories in their teaching and what did they do to allow students to engage in those types of learning? 100 pts Exemplary Provides a thorough and insightful explanation of how the teacher used Blooms Taxonomy, identifying both lower-level (e.g., Remembering, Understanding) and higher-level (e.g., Analyzing, Evaluating, Creating) categories. Clearly describes at least three specific levels of Blooms Taxonomy, with detailed examples of how the teacher engaged students in each level. Demonstrates strong understanding of Blooms Taxonomy and its application in teaching, with clear connections to student learning activities. 0 pts No Credit Provides little to no explanation of how the teacher used Blooms Taxonomy, with unclear or irrelevant examples. Mentions fewer than three levels of Blooms Taxonomy, or the examples provided are vague or unrelated to Blooms framework. Shows little to no understanding of how the teacher used different levels of learning in the classroom. 100 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 After observing and interacting in the classroom, what would you do differently in your future classroom to ensure your lesson plans are rigorous and effective? Please make sure to include specific details from the classroom(s) you visited, comparing and contrasting some things that didn’t work well despite the teacher’s plan, with what you think you would do differently in your own classroom. 100 pts Exemplary Provides a thorough and reflective comparison of the observed classroom with specific examples of things that did not work well in the teachers plan. Offers clear, detailed suggestions on what would be done differently in the future classroom to improve lesson rigor and effectiveness. Demonstrates a deep understanding of lesson planning and teaching strategies by addressing areas such as differentiation, student engagement, and assessment. The response is well-connected to observed experiences and future classroom practices, with specific examples showing how changes would be implemented. 0 pts No Credit Provides little to no reflection on classroom observations, with few or no examples of what did not work well. Fails to offer a meaningful explanation of what would be done differently in the future classroom. Shows little to no understanding of how to improve lesson planning or ensure lesson rigor and effectiveness. 100 pts Total Points: 300