My tutor comments as below:
You need to take your PhD study seriously. Quite a number of times I have provided feedback to improve your chapters but I find there is still much work to be done. Many of your claims are not validated. Refer to the chapter one feedback. If you have used AI tools to write the chapters, validation on your part is required as in many instances, AI output including references tend to be spurious. For example, the cited Statista (2024) did not discuss or present data about ESG. It merely mentioned the Number of listed companies at the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) from 2015 to 2024; Claim of 2% could not be found in the Low et al; (2015) article. Furthermore, it is an outdated article. There are several more issues. So, I want to meet you online to quickly validate these and other claims and as well as the gaps discussion. This is important for your PhD progress. Prepare the sources you have included in the chapters to validate the claims.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Critical Review Table of Sources.docx, 1-s20-S0927538X15000311-main (1).pdf, PhD Dissertation (Draft)_2026.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.