Evaluation of Nursing Research (Qualitative Research)

PICOT QUESTION In adult emergent patients requiring critical resuscitation, does intraosseous access, compared with intravenous access, improve medication delivery efficiency and increase rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during the resuscitation event?

Instructions:

Select a research article related to nursing and write a 2-3 double spaced page (NOT including the title page and references) article evaluation. Use only scholarly/professional, peer-reviewed articles written within the last 5 years You must choose your article by the end of week 2 and show it to your instructor for approval Use only scholarly/professional, peer-reviewed references. Do not use Wikipedia or internet sources that are not officially recognized as authority websites, as such websites are not scholarly sources. Also, keep in mind that not every .org domain is an authoritative website. 2-3 double spaced page (NOT including the title page and references) In your evaluation, address each of the following components: The author(s), their credentials, and practice areas Statement of problem or issue The purpose of the study Gap in the literature identified Research question(s) Review of the literature Population, sample size, and sample selection process Study design Research method(s) used in the study Research findings Limitations Article critique. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the study. Discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice Written in APA format (6th edition). This paper should include: Formal components including title page APA headers (include page numbers) APA formatted headings in the body of the paper Appropriate in-text reference citations A reference page, in correct APA format All assignments are expected to be submitted by the due dates. Refer to written assignments guidelines in the syllabus. Late assignments without faculty consultation and consent may result in a penalty of (5) points per college day past due on any written assignment. Failure to submit a written assignment and/or consistent lateness can result in a grade of 0 or F.

RUBRIC

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 1. Author(s), their credentials, and practice areasthreshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent. The author(s), their credentials, and practice areas are clearly and thoroughly identified Statement of the problem or issue and purpose of the study CSLO: 2 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The statement of the problem or issue and purpose of the study contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information No sources older then 2020 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 3. Research question(s) CSLO: 2 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent

, The research question(s) are clearly and thoroughly identified. Review of the literature and gap in the literature identified. CSLO: 2 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The review of the literature contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information. Thoroughly addresses presence or absence of gap in the literature. Population, sample size, and sample selection process CSLO: 2 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The population, sample size, and sample selection process contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information Research method(s) and study design CSLO: 2 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The research method(s) and study design contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information. . Research findings, limitations, and suggestions for future research CSLO: 5 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The research findings, limitations, and suggestions for future research contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information. Article Critique. Discuss strengths and weaknesses of the study. CSLO 3 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Exceeds MasteryExcellent.

The article critique contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information. Discussion of how the information in the article might be Discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice.uture nursing practice. CSLO 1, 5 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information APAthreshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

Skillful and proficient writing using appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting of the title page, headers, page numbers, headings in the body of the paper, appropriate in-text reference citations, and reference page. Written in 2-3 double spaced pages.