English Question

• Assignment 2 (50 points)
  • Prompt: Design vocabulary activities to be used in your thematic unit. Using the information found in Chapter 6 of our text and the eVoc Strategies article, create (3) activities that can be used to develop vocabulary within your unit plan. One of these activities must involve using technology in a way appropriate for student learning. Describe the activity and create any handouts that will be used with the activity. Identify the literacy (ELA) and content area mississippi standards for each activity. Use the Vocabulary Writing Assignment Template template found on Canvas, expanding it as necessary. Include APA-formatted title page and reference pageUnit 5 Writing Assignment 2 Rubric
    

    Unit 5 Writing Assignment 2 Rubric

    Criteria	Ratings	Pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNumber and quality of vocabulary activities (InTASC 4, 7; ILA 2)	20 ptsExceeds Expectations (4)The required number of activities were developed. The explanation of each activity was clear and detailed. The activities were appropriate for the grade level and subject area and involved strategies designed to build vocabulary knowledge. (20 pts)17 ptsMeets Expectations (3)The required number of activities were developed. The explanation of each activity was somewhat clear and detailed. The activities were generally appropriate for the grade level and subject area and involved strategies designed to build vocabulary knowledge (17 pts)14 ptsApproaching Expectations (2)Fewer than the required number of activities were developed. The explanation of each activity was unclear or lacked detail. The activities were not designed in a way that reinforced or extended vocabulary knowledge (14 pts)11 ptsDoes not meet expectations (1)Fewer than the required number of activities were developed. Elements in the template were missing or incomplete. The activities were not designed in a way that reinforced or extended vocabulary knowledge (11 pts)	20 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #4 – Content Knowledgethreshold: 3.0 pts	4 ptsAdvanced – The candidates performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.3 ptsProficient – The candidates performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.2 ptsBasic – The candidates performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking1 ptsMinimal – The candidates performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.	—
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #7B-1 – Planning for Instruction (updated)threshold: 3.0 pts	4 ptsAdvanced – The candidates performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.3 ptsProficient – The candidates performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.2 ptsBasic – The candidates performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.1 ptsMinimal – The candidates performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.	—
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2.1 – ILA Standard 2: Curriculum and Instructionthreshold: 3.0 pts	4 ptsAdvanced – The candidates performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.3 ptsProficient – The candidates performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.2 ptsBasic – The candidates performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking1 ptsMinimal – The candidates performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.	—
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Technology	10 ptsProficientAt least one vocabulary activity required the use of technology in a 21st century appropriate way.5 ptsBasicAt least one vocabulary activity required the use of technology but the use of technology did not enhance learning0 ptsMinimalNo technology was Used.	10 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHandouts	10 ptsAdvancedHandouts are neat, contain clear instructions, are creative, original, and effective. Handouts clearly reinforce learning rather than being busy work. (12 pts)8.5 ptsProficientHandouts are relatively neat, original, effective, and efficient. Handouts reinforce learning rather than being busy work7 ptsBasicAt least one vocabulary activity required the use of technology, but the use of technology did not enhance learning.0 ptsMinimal or MissingNo handouts are included although the activity needs them in order to be effective.	10 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandards	10 ptsAdvancedAppropriate ELA and Content Area standards are identified for each activity. The standards chosen align with and are met by the activity.8.5 ptsProficientELA and content area standards are identified for each activity. The activities meet most of the selected standards.7 ptsBasicELA or content area standards are missing from some of the activities or they only loosely correlate with the activities5.5 ptsMinimalNo standards are listed, or the standards listed do not correlate with the activities.	10 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA- compliant formatting	5 ptsAdvancedConsistently follows APA format, including title page, citations, and References page when required. (NO errors)4.25 ptsProficientConsistently follows APA format, including title page, citations, and References page when required. (1-2 MINOR errors).3.5 ptsBasicLimited (3-5) errors in APA format including title page, citations, and References page when required2.75 ptsMinimalMore than 5 APA errors in format, including title page, citations, or References page when required.	5 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics	5 ptsAdvancedThe presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS4.25 ptsProficientThe presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (1-2 MINOR errors)3.5 ptsBasicThe presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (3-5 errors).2.75 ptsMinimalThe presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (More than 5 errors).	5 pts

Struggling with your essay and deadlines?

Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.

NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions

✔Secure Service ✔ Plagiarism Free ✔On-time Delivery

WRITE MY PAPER