Domestic political hyper-partisanship and U.S. foreign polic…

I am enrolled in PSCI 3412 (American Foreign Policy) and need Essay #2 written according to the following instructions. Essay Prompt: Please answer all of the following questions: How has the tradition of domestic political hyper-partisanship shaped U.S. foreign policy since the beginning of the Republic? Has this hyper-partisanship moved away in the modern era (1965 until today) from the constitutional invitation to struggle into a volatile extension of domestic friction that negatively impacts the reputation and credibility of the United States on the world stage? Key requirements: Length: approximately 2000 words (not including cover page, endnotes, or bibliography) Format: double-spaced, 12-point font Citation style: Chicago (preferred), APA, or MLA Citations must be Author-Date in-text with page numbers, e.g. (McCormick, 18) Footnotes or endnotes are required A bibliography is optional but acceptable File must be converted to PDF correctly with citations displaying properly The paper must include a cover page with student name, course number, and title File name format: lastnamePSCI3412essay2.pdf Sources: Use primarily the following textbook as the main source. Do not rely heavily on outside sources unless absolutely necessary. James M. McCormick, American Foreign Policy and Process, ISBN 9781009278584 You may also reference relevant course lecture materials if helpful. Content expectations: The essay must be argumentative, not descriptive Directly answer both questions Explain the concept of constitutional invitation to struggle Show how partisanship has existed since the founding Analyze whether modern hyper-partisanship differs from earlier periods Discuss impacts on U.S. credibility, consistency, alliances, and reputation Use correct course terminology such as executive-legislative relations, separation of powers, institutional conflict, domestic politics, foreign policy process, credibility, and legitimacy Writing style requirements (very important): Write in a natural, conversational academic tone, not overly polished or textbook-like Clear and direct sentences Avoid inflated vocabulary and formulaic academic transitions Some sentence variation is acceptable Do not sound robotic or AI-generated Prioritize clarity, logical flow, and argument over overly complex wording Grading priorities: Substantively answers both questions Correct use of course concepts and terminology Clean grammar and structure Strict adherence to formatting and submission rules The essay must clearly take a position on whether modern hyper-partisanship has evolved into something more damaging than the original constitutional tension between branches, and support that position with historical and contemporary examples.