Part 1: Write at least a 500-word response to the following: Use APA format
- Convey your progress and/or barriers that have had an impact on your academic progress. Be specific in your examples of the progress and barriers.
- Also, include in your reflection your comments on what you learned from watching the video.
Part 2: Respond to the student in minimum 200 words: Use APA format
Doctoral writing has required a deliberate shift in how scholarly ideas are constructed, supported, and communicated. Reflecting on my progress, I recognize meaningful development in my academic voice, structural coherence, and research alignment. At the same time, I acknowledge barriers that have influenced my academic pace and productivity. This reflection demonstrates growth in critical thinking, scholarly integration, and self-assessment consistent with doctoral expectations.
One of the most impactful lessons from the School for Scholarly Writing tutorial was the reminder that Scholarly writing is an academic voice and it’s very different than other forms of writing. Earlier in my program, I occasionally wrote in a conversational tone, especially when discussing leadership and workforce well-beingtopics closely connected to my professional identity. The directive to use third person, not first, second, or first person plural required intentional editing and discipline. Shifting to the third person strengthened objectivity and aligned my writing with doctoral standards. Hyland (2022) explains that mastering disciplinary voice conventions strengthens scholarly identity and credibility, which I now recognize in my own work.
Another area of growth has been improving coherence and conceptual alignment. The tutorial emphasized that Coherence means that your ideas are fully developed and each sentence connects logically to the one that follows. Early drafts of my research contained fragmented transitions and insufficient synthesis. Through faculty feedback and revision, I learned to structure paragraphs intentionally so each advances the central argument. This development aligns with Nowell and Albrechts (2022) assertion that conceptual coherence is foundational to qualitative rigor. As I refine my narrative inquiry study, I now ensure that the problem statement, purpose statement, and research questions are tightly aligned.
The instruction to cite in the past tense also corrected an inconsistency in my writing. Understanding that authors stated their findings reflects scholarly precision and adherence to APA conventions (American Psychological Association [APA], 2020). Although small, these adjustments signal academic maturity and attention to detail. Despite this progress, time management remains a significant barrier. Balancing my role as a facility manager in a substance use treatment setting, a business owner transitioning to nonprofit status, and a doctoral student often fragments the focused time required for scholarly writing. Research indicates that competing professional demands can hinder doctoral productivity and increase stress (Dautermann et al., 2023). Recognizing this challenge has led me to implement structured writing blocks and prioritize realistic milestones. Perfectionism has also influenced my academic pace. The tutorial cautioned writers to use direct quotes sparingly, highlighting the importance of developing ones analytical voice. I realized that overreliance on quoting sometimes reflected hesitation to trust my interpretation. Smith and Lee (2021) note that perfectionism can increase writing anxiety and delay completion. Learning to draft imperfectly and refine through revision has improved both efficiency and confidence.
Finally, the directive to write in active voice strengthened my clarity and authority. Revising passive constructions has enhanced readability and precision. Sword (2022) emphasizes that active voice increases engagement and impact in scholarly writing, a principle I now apply consistently during editing. Overall, this tutorial reinforced that effective scholarly writing is grounded in clarity, coherence, evidence, and disciplined revision. While time constraints and perfectionistic tendencies remain areas for growth, I have strengthened my scholarly voice, structural alignment, and research rigor. As I progress toward dissertation completion, I am increasingly confident in my ability to produce structured, evidence-based scholarship reflective of doctoral-level standards.
Dautermann, J. L., McCrady, B., & Smyth, J. M. (2023). Time management challenges in doctoral writing: Implications for productivity and well-being. Journal of Writing Research, 15(1), 4267.
Hyland, K. (2022). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Nowell, L. S., & Albrecht, K. (2022). Advancing coherence in qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 111
Smith, J., & Lee, M. (2021). Perfectionism and academic writing productivity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 785800.
Sword, H. (2022). Writing with style: Academic writing for impact (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press
University of Phoenix. (2024). Tips for scholarly writing [Video tutorial]. School of Scholarly Writing.
OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (GPT-4.1).
Requirements: See details
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.