Do students ages 10-14 years that participate in group activ…

I need a 3 page paper with 7 references as a literature review. Instructions: Upon completing Worksheets 1, 2, and 3, you have identified a research question, inclusion and exclusion criteria, searched databases for literature, and have screened your studies for inclusion and exclusion into your study. For this assignment, you will write the first part of your final paper which will include a literature review, introducing your population, problem, intervention(s), and gaps in the knowledge in current research (i.e., why you are conducting this systematic review). Next, you will describe the methodology utilized to conduct your search and how many articles met inclusion criteria.

THE ASSIGNMENT TITLE IS THE QUESTION I AM ANSWERING WITH THIS PAPER, mainly seeing if you group ADHD kids in group activities with other ADHD kids will it build up their confidence to succeed, if there is not enough out there to write on covering that just use: are they better in group activities like sports than receiving individual therapy?

Example/Outline: Assignment Part 1: Literature Review and Methodology

This assignment covers the beginning sections of your paper, including the background, identification of gaps, research problem, and objectives of the review. These elements help set the context for the rest of the paper and provide a strong foundation for your argument.

NOTE: The literature review should not include any references/articles from your systematic search. This instead should be a literature review discussing the following information and setting the stage for why you needed to complete the systematic review on your topic. Please review some of the systematic review examples we have had in the course to understand how the literature review sets the stage for the systematic review. This section should be between 3-5 pages and include 7-10 references (again, not including any articles from your systematic search).

1. Introduction (Background and Context)
2. Overview of the Topic/Problem StatementDefinition: Begin by defining the key terms or concepts related to the topic of your review. For example, if the review is on “post-traumatic stress interventions,” briefly define what constitutes “post-traumatic stress” is.
3. Context: Provide background on the broader context of issue being reviewed. Why is this topic important in the current research landscape? What has led to increased attention on this topic in recent years (e.g., societal shifts, policy changes, emerging needs)?
4. These questions can guide you in this sectionHow many people are affected by this problem?
5. Why is this an important social problem?
6. How does this social problem impact other social issues or focal populations?
7. Why is your population an important one to study?
8. Significance of the TopicRelevance: Explain why the topic is significant and relevant to the social work field. How does it impact practice, policy, or research? Why should researchers and practitioners care about this topic? Provide statistics or recent trends.
9. Scope: Outline the scope of the literature review. Is it focused on a specific population, intervention, or geographical area? Defining the scope helps frame the subsequent search strategy and limits the literature pool.Describe the important concepts and research findings for related to your PICO question.
10. Describe the important concepts and research findings related to the population and issue
11. What other variables or social forces influence on the population and issue?
12. Describe what is known about your target population
13. Current State of ResearchHistorical Background: Provide a brief history or development of the intervention. How has the research evolved over time?
14. Current Findings: Summarize the major findings in the field related to your topic, making sure to touch on the most significant and recent contributions. This establishes the foundation for identifying gaps in knowledge.Identify consistent findings across studies on the various interventions addressing this issue- if there are multiple interventions- describe these various interventions (setting the stage for the next section)
15. Identification of Research Gaps
16. Unresolved Questions or IssuesIdentify areas in the literature where there are unanswered questions or issues that remain unresolved. For example, if a large body of literature exists on the effectiveness of a specific intervention, highlight areas that remain uncertain (e.g., “while numerous studies have examined the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy for treating depression, few have considered its long-term impacts” or while numerous studies have examined the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy for treating depression, there barriers to in-person therapy for those living in rural areas, leaving a gap in understanding what online CBT therapies are effective in treating depression).
17. Contradictory Findings or InconsistenciesDiscuss inconsistencies or contradictions in the research findings. Are there studies that show conflicting results? Highlight areas where studies disagree or where evidence appears mixed.
18. Example: While several studies report that aromatherapy interventions improve mental health outcomes, other studies suggest that they have minimal impact, especially for XYZ populations.
19. Methodological IssuesIdentify methodological limitations within existing research. Are studies in the field suffering from small sample sizes, biased sampling, or poor generalizability? Discuss any common weaknesses in the research methodologies used (e.g., lack of randomized controlled trials, low-quality surveys, etc.).
20. Understudied AreasPoint out any underexplored or neglected areas within the topic. Are certain populations, contexts, or interventions consistently left out of studies? Highlight gaps that might present an opportunity for further research.
21. Example: Although much of the research has focused on urban populations, rural communities remain underrepresented in studies on YOUR SPECIFIC mental health interventions.
22. Calls for Future ResearchBriefly reference any calls in the existing literature for further investigation. Are experts in the field suggesting specific research questions or topics that need to be explored?
23. Research Problem or Question
24. Clear Statement of the ProblemBased on the gaps identified, define the research problem that your review aims to address. What specific issue does the review attempt to tackle? How does your systematic review seek to contribute to filling the identified gaps?
25. Example: The lack of consensus on the long-term effectiveness of aromatherapy on mental health, particularly among youth populations, presents a significant research gap.
26. Importance of Addressing the ProblemJustify why it is important to address this research problem. What will be gained by synthesizing the existing literature and identifying areas for future research?
27. Example: Understanding the long-term impacts of these interventions is critical for improving service delivery and optimizing outcomes for vulnerable populations.
28. State your PICO question
29. Methodology
30. Inclusion CriteriaDefine the characteristics of the studies that are included in the review based on the research question.
31. Exclusion CriteriaDefine the studies that are excluded from your review
32. Search StrategyWhat databases and Boolean operations were utilized in your search
33. Screening/Selection processInitial number of articles found, number of articles excluded at title, abstract, and full text review, respectively.

Summary of Key Sections:

1. Introduction Background, significance, and current state of research.
2. Identification of Research Gaps Unresolved questions, contradictions, methodological weaknesses, and neglected areas.
3. Research Problem Clear problem statement and justification for addressing the issue, state your PICO question
4. Methodology-Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria, search strategy, and screening/selection process