I am requesting dissertation revision support focused on chair-directed feedback, methodological refinement, and final formatting alignment. I will be attaching the following materials for your review:
- My current dissertation draft with tracked changes and margin comments from my committee chair
- A completed dissertation previously approved by my chair for another doctoral student, to be used strictly as a benchmark for formatting, structure, and methodological presentation
Your scope of work should include the following:
Carefully review and implement all substantive and stylistic revisions requested by my chair (note: I have already addressed several of the chairs comments and made preliminary revisions; this review should focus on confirming alignment with remaining feedback and refining as needed)
Ensure that all chair-requested changes are fully and accurately incorporated
Use the attached benchmark dissertation to verify correct font, spacing, headings, pagination, and overall formatting consistency
Confirm full APA 7 compliance throughout the document
In addition, please complete a thorough review and refinement of Chapter 3 (Methodology) to ensure it is fully defensible and aligned with my chairs expectations for a qualitative, phenomenological (IPA) study. This includes:
Clear justification of the interpretative phenomenological analysis approach
Alignment between the research questions, participant selection, data collection, and analysis procedures
Precise, step-by-step explanation of the IPA analytic process
Appropriate positioning of theoretical frameworks as interpretive lenses rather than causal drivers
Explicit treatment of trustworthiness, reflexivity, and methodological rigor
Upon completion, please return the dissertation as a clean Microsoft Word document, with all tracked changes, comments, and markup removed, so that it is ready for formal resubmission to my chair.
If you identify any areas that may still raise committee concerns, please flag those separately for my review rather than embedding comments in the manuscript.
Thank you, and I look forward to working with a service experienced in doctoral-level, chair-directed dissertation revisions.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): USM diss Examining Relationships Between Agile Workplace Practices Produc.pdf, CMF Edits_12-19 Diss (1) (1).docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.