Discussion week 3

After reading and studying the article, consider the following:

Reflect on the three dynamics the article identifiesestablishing legitimacy, maneuvering politically, and negotiating perpetually. Which of these dynamics resonates most with your understanding of effective leadership in collaborative or high-stakes environments? Why?
The article illustrates leadership challenges and strategies with examples such as Daniel, Christine, and Antonio. Choose one of these cases and analyze the leadership lessons it conveys. How do these lessons relate to your personal experiences in leadership or teamwork?
The article stresses that leadership in professional service firms is inherently collective and contingent on the consent of peers. How do you interpret the idea of “collective leadership”? How have you seen this concept play out in your professional or academic life?
In your opinion, are the principles discussed in this article unique to professional service firms, or can they be applied in other organizational contexts? Provide examples to support your view.
600-800 words

After you done I will send my classmate discussion and you have to reply to it.

Requirements: 1p

Comments