Discussion Board Topic #1, Navigating the Outrage: Communica…

rewrite the post for class

A critical insight provided by Ramannas *Managing in the Age of Outrage* (2022) book is that organizations need to recognize that often, what fuels outrage among stakeholders or the public is not purely a function of objective or technical reality but rather a function of perceived fairness and accountability. In a fast-paced crisis management scenario, stakeholders do not simply evaluate whether or not there was adherence to policy but also assess whether there was integrity and empathy involved. Ramannas argument here suggests that what leaders ought to strive for is strategic transparency, which means providing information transparently and timely but not being defensive or evasive. This framework seems especially relevant to the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) case study, where heightened scrutiny and media engagement fueled emotional reactions. In such a context, strategic transparency does not mean revealing all the details but rather revealing a willingness to be transparent and providing clarity on the decision-making process while correcting misinformation as soon as possible. This approach helps to manage any speculation that might result from a lack of information and thereby reinforce credibility.

Equally important to consider are elements like empathy and strategic messaging. Ramannas argument here suggests that leaders need to validate stakeholders emotions before attempting to defend organizational actions. In a context like CAMHs, this might mean recognizing the emotional salience of the issue at hand and delineating steps being taken to address these very issues. Strategic messaging might require maintaining consistent messaging across all channels and aligning it with organizational values to ensure interpretive outcomes within a polarized media environment. By integrating elements like strategic transparency with elements like empathy and strategic messaging, an organization can hope to secure its own reputation not by dismissing or denying negative publicity but by proving its accountability and responsiveness to stakeholders.