cw 2

I have done the assignment, and it’s in the following file. I just need help reducing the AI percentage and getting a full mark on this assignment. Here are the grading rubric and the assignment requirements.

Process Work (BB Journal CHECKPOINTS)

5 possible points (16.67%)

Band 1 GRADE 0: No process work completed. GRADE 1: Process work is incomplete, with few or no revisions made, demonstrating minimal effort and significant gaps in completion and improvement.

0 – 1

Band 2GRADE 2: Process work completed, with minimal revisions, showing limited effort and minimal improvement. One submission made to the online journal.

2 – 2

Band 3GRADE 3: Process work completed, with revisions that show some effort and basic attention to feedback, though improvement may be inconsistent. One submission made to the online journal.

3 – 3

Band 4GRADE 4: Process work completed, with effective revisions, reflecting good attention to feedback and noticeable improvement. More than one submission made to the online journal.

4 – 4

Band 5GRADE 5: Process work completed, with detailed and effective revisions, demonstrating substantial improvement and careful attention to feedback. More than one submission made to the online journal.

5 – 5

• Research proficiency and citation accuracy
• 5 possible points (16.67%)
• Band 1GRADE 0: No research submitted. GRADE 1: Research is inadequate or missing, with incorrect or absent referencing. Citations are mostly incorrect or missing.
• 0 – 1
• Band 2GRADE 2: Research is limited with frequent referencing errors. Citations are often incorrect or inconsistent.
• 2 – 2
• Band 3GRADE 3: Research is adequate with some referencing errors. Citations are mostly correct but with some inconsistencies.
• 3 – 3
• Band 4GRADE 4: Research is well-conducted with minor referencing errors. Citations are mostly correct and consistent.
• 4 – 4
• Band 5GRADE 5: Research is thorough with correct and consistent referencing throughout. Citations are flawless.
• 5 – 5
• Critical analysis and insight
• 5 possible points (16.67%)
• Band 1GRADE 0: The analysis is missing entirely, showing no understanding of digital literacy concepts. GRADE 1: The analysis is very limited, demonstrating minimal understanding of digital literacy concepts.
• 0 – 1
• Band 2GRADE 2: The analysis is basic, with a limited application of digital literacy concepts.
• 2 – 2
• Band 3GRADE 3: The analysis is sufficient, demonstrating a basic understanding of digital literacy concepts.
• 3 – 3
• Band 4GRADE 4: The analysis is clear and well-structured, demonstrating a solid understanding of digital literacy concepts.
• 4 – 4
• Band 5GRADE 5: The analysis is highly detailed and insightful, demonstrating a deep understanding of digital literacy concepts.
• 5 – 5
• Analysis and evaluation of supporting data
• 5 possible points (16.67%)
• Band 1GRADE 0: No analysis and/or evaluation submitted. GRADE 1: The analysis is inadequate or missing, failing to address production techniques or concepts.
• 0 – 1
• Band 2GRADE 2: The analysis is limited, with minimal application of digital literacy techniques and concepts.
• 2 – 2
• Band 3GRADE 3: The analysis is adequate, addressing digital literacy techniques and some digital literacy concepts.
• 3 – 3
• Band 4GRADE 4: The analysis is well-developed, with clear insights into digital literacy techniques and concepts.
• 4 – 4
• Band 5GRADE 5: The campaign analysis is exceptional, providing detailed examination of digital literacy techniques and concepts.
• 5 – 5
• Structure and organization of the content
• 5 possible points (16.67%)
• Band 1GRADE 0: No discernable structure. GRADE 1: Structure is disorganized and unclear, with minimal or missing required sections.
• 0 – 1
• Band 2GRADE 2: Structure is weak with significant issues in organization and presentation of sections.
• 2 – 2
• Band 3GRADE 3: Structure is basic with some issues in organization and presentation of sections.
• 3 – 3
• Band 4GRADE 4: Structure is mostly clear and organized with minor issues in the presentation of sections.
• 4 – 4
• Band 5GRADE 5: Structure is clear and well-organized with all required sections effectively presented.
• 5 – 5
• Quality of writing – accuracy, formatting, and submission
• 5 possible points (16.67%)
• Band 1GRADE 0: Writing is very confusing. GRADE 1: Numerous errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Multiple formatting or submission requirements are missing.
• 0 – 1
• Band 2GRADE 2: Frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Some formatting or submission requirements are incomplete.
• 2 – 2
• Band 3GRADE 3: Some minor errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Most formatting and submission requirements are met.
• 3 – 3
• Band 4GRADE 4: Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Nearly all formatting and submission requirements are met.
• 4 – 4
• Band 5GRADE 5: No errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. All formatting and submission requirements are fully met.