please respodn to alexander with 150. words. no plagiarism, no ai no chat bots
Utilitarianism judges whether something is right or wrong based on its consequences. An action is ethical if it produces the greatest overall good for the most amount of people. If the harm outweighs the benefits then its not justified. The company could argue the update is ethical because watch time increased by 22% and ad revenue went up. More engagement might mean users are entertained and shareholders benefit financially, from certain perspectives that looks good. However the increase of misinformation creates social harm, misinformation can damage public trust, influence elections, and harm public health. This can lead to an increase in division and hostility. Under utilitarianism, we have to weigh those large scale harms against higher engagement and profit. Because the platform operates at a massive scale, even small changes can impact millions. We also see unintended consequences. The algorithm was designed to increase engagement, but it also boosts harmful and misleading content. Even if that wasn’t intended utilitarianism still evaluates outcomes, If the result increases societal harm, the action is ethically problematic. You could also argue that the algorithm may be bias if it promotes extreme or emotionally charged content because it performs better. The company should modify and regulate the algorithm rather than keep it as is. From a utilitarian perspective, they should redesign it to reduce the misinformation and to prioritize credible sources. The goal should to maximize overall well being, not just engagement.
Requirements: computer ethics
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.