please respond to abril with 150. words. no plagiarism, no ai no chat bots
This week, were diving into ethical frameworks and technology, and honestly, its wild how messy real-world tech decisions get. Take artificial intelligence in hiring. More and more companies are letting AI screen resumes, rank job applicants, even analyze how people talk on Zoom. Sure, these tools promise to speed things up and take out human bias, but when you start looking at them through an ethical lens, some big problems show up. Lets look at utilitarianism first. On paper, AI hiring tools make sense they chew through thousands of applications, cut costs, and help companies match the right people to the right jobs. If you care about the greatest good for the most people, it seems like a no-brainer. But utilitarianism also forces us to think about who gets hurt. If the AI is built on biased data, it can end up locking out entire groups of people. Suddenly, all that efficiency starts to look a lot less appealing if it means more discrimination and deeper inequality. Switch to deontological ethics and the conversation changes. Here, its not just about results its about the rules and duties we follow. Employers have a duty to treat people fairly and respect their dignity. If an AI makes decisions in a black box, and nobody knows why they got rejected or what the system saw in them, thats a problem.
Imagine a world where every hiring choice is made by some mysterious algorithm you cant question. Kant would probably say thats not a world we should be okay with. Now, throw in virtue ethics. It asks, What does using AI in this way say about a companys character? A good company cares about fairness, transparency, and responsibility not just about saving money or speeding things up. If a business rolls out a flawed AI system just because its cheap or easy, thats not exactly a shining example of integrity. Scale and bias are huge here. AI works at massive scale, so even a tiny bias in the data can end up affecting thousands, maybe millions, of people way more than a single biased interviewer ever could. And the bias is sneakier, too. Its not always obvious, which makes it even more dangerous. Then theres the way AI changes how we see people. Instead of looking at a full person, employers might just see a score or a set of data points. That reduces people to numbers, and it messes with our ability to make real, fair judgments about who they are.
The Harm Principle is pretty clear: dont do things that hurt others. If these hiring systems are quietly shutting out qualified people, even by accident, then its time to step in regulate, redesign, whatever it takes. Just because the harm wasnt intentional doesnt mean companies can shrug it off. Responsibility still matters.
Requirements: Computer Ethics
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.