JKL Corporation offers end-to-end encryption services to customers in its proprietary messaging application. JKL prides itself in offering private communications that are not subject to eavesdropping. Given their high level of encryption, the messages of suspected criminals cannot be viewed by law enforcement. Court orders and authorized search warrants demanding access to customer communications have begun to be served on JKL to access customer profile information and content. JKL faces a dilemma of not wanting to provide user content, which it claims it cannot independently access and being unwilling to grant law enforcement access to its encryption keys. Before responding, consider the following prompts:
- Reflect on the significance of the constitutional concerns and legal implications of government surveillance addressing cybersecurity.
- How do we evaluate the government’s need to offer cybersecurity safety?
- Reflect on the importance of existing federal legislation allowing for eavesdropping on electronic communications.
Discussion Prompts
- Mandatory Prompt
- How does the Fifth Amendment apply to the governments request for decryption?
- Choose One Additional Prompt
- What ethical concerns and theories apply to JKLs dilemma?
- How can JKL avoid compliance with court-ordered action forcing decryption?
- If JKL software engineers were able to access customer data and messaging along with discovered illegal activity, to whom should they report it?
Initial Post
- All students are required to respond to the mandatory prompt. Next, select and answer one of the additional prompts provided above. Your initial post should fully address both prompts and include real-world links/applications.
- When constructing your initial post, remember to critically analyze the topic and add substantial thought to the subject area. Utilizing the resources provided in your course materials will enhance your understanding and response to the questions.
- Use concrete examples drawn from current events, historical instances or personal experiences to illustrate your points in discussing your selected prompt…..
Reply to at least two peers considering the following prompts
- Provide substantive replies to at least two classmates’ initial posts, utilizing at least one reference to support your argument. These replies should offer new insights and critique or expand upon the ideas presented.
- Add at least one concept or fact that your peer did not consider in their initial post.
- Replies that only say things such as good job or that regurgitate the initial post of your peer are not sufficient and should be avoided.
Posting Guidelines
Requirements: 2p
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.