CLINICAL CASE

Using the client information provided, respond to the critical thinking questions. Each response should be original (in your own words) and a minimum of three sentences in length.

Client Information

Meet your client, Mr. Olson.

Mr. Olson is a 65-year-old man who has come to the clinic for a complete physical checkup. He has no health complaints, and his physical examination is negative except for a few minor changes associated with aging. During the interview, he tells you that he is gay and has had the same partner for five years. On further questioning, he reveals that he has had numerous sex partners during his lifetime. He says, I was wondering if I should be tested for HIV, and Mike, thats my partner, says I ought to get a flu shot and maybe a hepatitis shot. What do you think?

Critical Thinking Questions

  1. What principles and concepts do you need to know to help Mr. Olson today?
  2. What communication skills will you need to help Mr. Olson?
  3. What further data do you need about Mr. Olsons sexual activity?
  4. What is one important nursing intervention for today?
  5. Self-reflection is a priority in caring for clients in nursing. How do you feel about same-sex relationships? Will your personal feelings impact your ability to care for Mr. Olson effectively? Why or why not?
  6. What does the ANA Nursing Code of Ethics (2015) say about relationships to clients and the nature of client health problems?

Submission and Assessment Guidelines

  • Submit your Microsoft Word document with the questions clearly listed and answered.
  • Each response should be clear, concise, and use correct grammar. All of the questions MUST be answered in your document.
  • Turnitin is enabled for this assignment.
  • Review the Full-Spectrum Nursing Rubric for grading criteria.
  • This activity is worth 60 points.

Rubric

NUR 211 – Full-Spectrum Nursing Rubric (5)

NUR 211 – Full-Spectrum Nursing Rubric (5)

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections

45 ptsOutstandingEvidence of critical thinking, provides rationale, as well as examples and specific details.35 ptsGoodEvidence of critical thinking and details, mostly specific.

25 ptsProficientEvidence of critical thinking and details, but usually of a generalized nature.15 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdea presence is limited or not supported.0 ptsUnacceptableIdea presence is limited and not supported.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

15 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented; ideas are detailed and well-developed.12 ptsGoodWell-presented; ideas are detailed and mostly well-developed.

8 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported.4 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable.0 ptsUnacceptableContent is not sound.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCourse Outcome 1Demonstrate use of the nursing process

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsExceeds Mastery3 ptsMastery

2 ptsNear Mastery1 ptsBelow Mastery0 ptsNo evidence

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCourse Outcome 2Apply the clinical judgement model

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsExceeds Mastery3 ptsMastery

2 ptsNear Mastery1 ptsBelow Mastery0 ptsNo Evidence

Total Points: 6

Requirements: a minimum of three sentences in length

WRITE MY PAPER


Comments

Leave a Reply